Page summary

https://www.proantic.com/magazine/

Errors
SummaryRenderingCPUCrUx

How it scored

median of 3 runs

Run with --video to replay what the user saw frame by frame. The verdict and fixes below don't need it.

Chrome UX Report

real users · p75 · last 30 days
LCP644 ms
INP44 ms
CLS0.010
FCP542 ms
TTFB331 ms
Largest Contentful Paint
97.4%1.6%1.0%
Interaction to Next Paint
100.0%0.0%0.0%
Cumulative Layout Shift
100.0%0.0%0.0%
First Contentful Paint
95.7%2.2%2.1%

Rendering

Run 1 · median
0.000 s
Download video

Filmstrip

0 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Why was rendering delayed?

Want to see how much CSS style-recalculation work delayed FCP and LCP, plus CPU long tasks? Run with --cpu.

CPU

Get deeper CPU insight with one extra run
Run with --enableProfileRun to see where main-thread time went, blocking time and CPU cost per script, module and function, forced reflows and frame stability. The data is collected in one extra run, so the timing metrics of your measured runs stay untouched.

|loadingExperience PHONE | | loadingExperience DESKTOP | | loadingExperience TABLET | | loadingExperience ALL | | 

CrUx

Chrome User Experience Report (CrUx) is real-user data from opted-in Chrome users, aggregated over the last 30 days. Toggle the form factor with--crux.formFactor.

This page passes the Core Web Vitals for real users.

LCP, INP and CLS are in the good range at the 75th percentile.

This page

Form factor ALL

2026-09-05 to 2026-10-02
FCP542 ms
LCP644 ms
CLS0.010
INP44 ms
TTFB331 ms
RTT113 ms
Distribution
First Contentful Paint
95.74%2.19%2.07%
Largest Contentful Paint
97.36%1.60%1.04%
Cumulative Layout Shift
100.00%0.00%0.00%
Interaction to Next Paint
100.00%0.00%0.00%
TTFB
94.14%2.36%3.50%
Round Trip Time
55.67%41.15%3.18%

All pages on this origin