Page summary

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

Tested 2026-10-12 01:40:27 using Chrome 152.0.7977.64 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPUThird partyaxe

This page is fast to paint and accessible, but a little janky to interact with, prone to layout shifts, loose on best practices and weak on user privacy.

79 / 100
Coach overall
86 / 100
Performance
68 / 100
Best practice
72 / 100
Privacy

How it loaded →

0 → 1.567 s · median run
Frame at 0 ms
start
Frame at 400 ms
400 ms
Frame at 700 ms
Largest paint700 ms
Frame at 1000 ms
1.000 s
Frame at 1300 ms
1.300 s
Frame at 1600 ms
Complete1.600 s
366 ms
First Visual Change
554 ms
Speed Index
966 ms
Visual Complete 85%
1.567 s
Last Visual Change
TTFB80 msLCP444 msTBT212 msCLS0.28
0
Critical violations
0
Serious violations
0
Moderate violations
0
Minor violations

What to act on · top recommendations

Avoid using Google Tag Manager.

0 / 100

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Avoid CPU Long Tasks

0 / 100

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 610 ms. The total blocking time is 295 ms and 1 long task before first contentful paint with total time of 65 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Avoid too many fonts

0 / 100

The page has 12 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

Google Web Vitals

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Time To First Byte (TTFB)57 ms80 ms74 ms85 msruns disagree ±18%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)344 ms444 ms551 ms864 msruns disagree ±59%
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0.03410.27820.19710.279runs disagree ±44%

Visual Metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First visual change267 ms366 ms411 ms600 msruns disagree ±45%
Last visual change1.566 s1.567 s1.589 s1.633 sstable ±2%
Speed index543 ms554 ms664 ms896 msruns disagree ±32%
Largest image267 ms366 ms411 ms600 msruns disagree ±45%
Heading1.500 s1.533 s1.555 s1.633 sstable ±4%
Largest contentful paint366 ms1.500 s1.166 s1.633 sruns disagree ±42%
Last meaningful paint1.500 s1.533 s1.555 s1.633 sstable ±4%
Visual readiness1.033 s1.200 s1.178 s1.300 sruns disagree ±11%
Visual complete 85933 ms966 ms1.000 s1.100 svaries ±9%
Visual complete 951.333 s1.400 s1.455 s1.633 sruns disagree ±11%
Visual complete 991.566 s1.567 s1.589 s1.633 sstable ±2%

CPU

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Total Blocking Time176 ms212 ms228 ms295 msruns disagree ±28%
Max Potential FID138 ms145 ms151 ms170 msruns disagree ±11%
CPU long tasks 6667varies ±8%
CPU last long task happens at846 ms1.042 s1.064 s1.303 sruns disagree ±22%

More metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First paint276 ms344 ms404 ms592 msruns disagree ±46%
Load event end721 ms1.184 s1.120 s1.456 sruns disagree ±31%

Waterfall

Run 2 SpeedIndex median

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 2 · median
0.000 s
0s0.5s1s1.5s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

16 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 200 ms
200 ms
0 %
Frame at 300 ms
300 ms
0 %
Frame at 400 ms
400 ms
73 %
Frame at 500 ms
500 ms
73 %
Frame at 600 ms
600 ms
75 %
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
79 %
Frame at 800 ms
800 ms
80 %
Frame at 900 ms
900 ms
81 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
83 %
Frame at 1.100 s
1.100 s
92 %
Frame at 1.200 s
1.200 s
93 %
Frame at 1.300 s
1.300 s
94 %
Frame at 1.400 s
1.400 s
95 %
Frame at 1.500 s
1.500 s
96 %
Frame at 1.600 s
1.600 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Frames

How smoothly Chrome delivered frames to the screen during the test. Dropped counts only frames Chrome flags as affecting smoothness. On mostly-static pages the longest gap includes idle time where there was simply nothing to draw.

Frames shown511
Partial16
Dropped32
Effective FPS56.7
Longest gap62 msat 8.617 s

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 344 ms on a 57 ms first byte; the 1 render-blocking request was done by 83 ms and the remaining ~261 ms is style and layout work (98 ms of it measured style recalculation and forced reflows).

Style recalculation

measured by Chrome during this run

Style the browser had to recalculate before it could paint: many elements or a lot of time spent here points at expensive CSS on the critical rendering path. The recalculation count and the largest single one tell the two problems apart: one massive style change touching most of the page (few recalculations, the largest close to the total) needs different medicine than thousands of tiny ones (many recalculations, each tiny).

One large recalculation dominates. Restyling 601 elements cost 63 ms before the page painted (18.3 % of the time to First Contentful Paint), and a single recalculation of 369 elements accounts for 35 ms of it. Look for one class or inline-style change on a large container near the top of the DOM that restyles the whole subtree at once. The changes driving it are listed under Style invalidations below.

Before first & largest contentful paint (same paint, 344 ms)

Recalculations5
Elements601
Total time62.858 ms
Largest recalculation369 elements · 35.163 ms

The recalculation work before first paint is 18.3 % of the time to First Contentful Paint.

Forced reflows before the page painted

measured by Chrome during this run

JavaScript read a layout value (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) while the page was mid-change, so the browser had to re-layout synchronously, work that blocks rendering. Reflows before First Contentful Paint delayed the first pixels; reflows before Largest Contentful Paint delayed the main content.

Forced reflows before FCP1
Time spent in forced reflows before FCP35.2 ms
Forced reflows before LCP1
Time spent in forced reflows before LCP35.2 ms

That is 10.2 % of the time to Largest Contentful Paint. The number of reflows matters more than the milliseconds: layout thrashing multiplies on slower devices.

See every forced reflow for the whole page load on the CPU tab

Render blocking requests

1 request · 18.9 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint; the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
www.antiquites-en-france.com · TTFB 57 ms
90 ms
19.2 KB89 ms
css · www.antiquites-en-france.com
14 ms
18.9 KB14 ms
LCP resource
logo-aef.png — downloaded by 110 ms, rendered at 344 ms
15 ms
3.1 KB15 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after FCP, at 370 ms
23.1 KB83 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after FCP, at 371 ms
23.2 KB56 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after FCP, at 387 ms
23.3 KB50 ms
086 ms172 msFCP · LCP 344 ms

Style invalidations

Why the browser had to recalculate style and layout: every DOM/style change invalidates some set of nodes, and the same class or attribute churning over and over is the pattern to hunt. Counts, not milliseconds: the time is in the style recalculation numbers above.

Chase what keeps changing after the page is up. 142 style recalculations and 513 layout invalidations fired after first paint, on a page the user was already looking at. The biggest driver is attribute class (25×). Start with the script under "Scripts causing invalidations" that keeps triggering it.

Style recalculations359142 after first paint
Layout invalidations2 489513 after first paint

Changes that keep invalidating

top 4
  • attribute: class25×
  • attribute: data-aos-easing1×
  • attribute: data-aos-duration1×
  • attribute: data-aos-delay1×

Invalidation reasons

split at first paint

After first paint

Invalidations on a page the user was already looking at, the actionable half.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A stylesheet rule changed12–
A node was inserted into the page46–
Related style rule48–
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.31–
Frame1–
An @keyframes rule changed2–
Control1–
JavaScript changed an inline styleSet a class instead of writing element.style, so the browser can batch the work.1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–324
An element entered layout–127
An element left layout–43
A style change forced layout–11
An element's size changed–7
Scrollbar changed–1

Before first paint: building the page

The page being constructed and styled for the first render. Expected work, shown for scale.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A stylesheet rule changed211–
A node was inserted into the page5–
Frame1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–1 092
An element entered layout–875
An element left layout–3
An element's size changed–3
Scrollbar changed–3

Scripts causing invalidations

top 5

1 animation runs on the main thread instead of on the browser's fast path that animates without blocking other page work (the compositor); they can make the rendering you see above janky. See them on the CPU tab.

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

What to fix first

Performance advice

86
8 warnings3 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Tag Manager.googleTagManager

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Google Tag Manager makes it possible for non tech users to add scripts to your page that will downgrade performance.

warn(0)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 610 ms. The total blocking time is 295 ms and 1 long task before first contentful paint with total time of 65 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • same-origin-descendant
  • self
  • self
  • same-origin-descendant
  • self
  • self
infoAvoid too many fontsfewFonts

The page has 12 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

How many fonts do you need on a page for the user to get the message? Fonts can slow down the rendering of content, try to avoid loading too many of them because worst case it can make the text invisible until they are loaded (FOIT—flash of invisible text), best case they will flicker the text content when they arrive.

Offenders
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 422.4 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.3 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/runtime.882d785a.js2.0 KB2.9 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/686.1d5dc2ba.js71.8 KB254.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/971.c0d484bd.js13.4 KB45.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/app.183e975c.js655 B111 B
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K125.4 KB368.0 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/home.885e1790.js5.2 KB14.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/89.a3b9b01d.js2.9 KB6.6 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/g/scripts/jsd/...4a60fa397/main.js12.4 KB23.8 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-58XGFJWZ1E&cx=c&gtm=4e6a72178.7 KB538.1 KB
warn(80)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 2 requests with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 2 images (out of 14) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(86)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 2 images (out of 14) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(90)Avoid doing redirectsassetsRedirects

The page has 1 redirect. 1 of the redirects are from the base domain, please fix them!

A redirect is one extra step for the user to download the asset. Avoid that if you want to be fast. Redirects are even more of a showstopper on mobile.

Offenders
warn(90)Always compress text contentcompressAssets

The page has 1 request that are served uncompressed. You could save a lot of bytes by sending them compressed instead.

In the early days of the Internet there were browsers that didn't support compressing (gzipping) text content. They do now. Make sure you compress HTML, JSON, JavaScript, CSS and SVG. It will save bytes for the user; making the page load faster and use less bandwith.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/g/scripts/jsd/...4a60fa397/main.js12.4 KB23.8 KB
warn(92)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 1 below-the-fold image without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 4 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders

Best practice advice

68
1 error1 warning2 info
error(0)Cumulative Layout ShiftcumulativeLayoutShift

You have a poor cumulative layout shift score (0.2782). It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, with a shift higher than 0.25. You should manually check the filmstrip or video and check if it will affect the user.

Cumulative Layout Shift measures the sum total of all individual layout shift scores for unexpected layout shift that occur. The metric is measuring visual stability by quantify how often users experience unexpected layout shifts. It is one of Google Web Vitals.

warn(0)Avoid too many third party requeststhirdParty

The page do 38% requests to third party domains (16 requests and 407.4 kB). First party is 26 requests and 369.4 kB. The page transfer more bytes from third party domains (407.4 kB) then first party (369.4 kB). The regex .*antiquites-en-france.* was used to calculate first/third party requests.

Do not load most of your content from third party URLs.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 24 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 2 responses that sets a pragma no-cache header (that is a request header). There are 30 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
infoDo not send too long headerslongHeaders

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/ has a header content-security-policy-report-only that is 1031 characters long. https://www.antiquit.../a492658e6aa3c5ee has a header cf-chl-out-s that is 2265 characters long.

Do not send response headers that are too long.

Offenders

Privacy advice

72
6 warnings2 info
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Avoid embedding services from surveillance capitalist companiessurveillance

The page embeds 2 resources from companies that profit from user surveillance. Consider privacy-respecting alternatives.

Embedding scripts or iframes from companies whose business model is surveillance capitalism (Google, Facebook, etc.) leaks detailed user data on every page view, often before the user has had a chance to consent. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism for background. Prefer privacy-respecting alternatives where possible.

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 10% requests that are 3rd party (4 requests with a size of 311.4 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 2 tag-manager requests and uses 1 tag-manager tool. The page do 2 survelliance requests and uses 1 survelliance tool. The page do 4 surveillance requests and uses 2 surveillance tools. The page do 2 analytics requests and uses 1 analytics tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(70)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

The policy declares no default-src or script-src directive, which means scripts can be loaded from anywhere. Add at least default-src so unknown directive types fall back to a safe value. Set object-src 'none' (or a default-src 'none' fallback) so the page cannot load Flash, plugins or other legacy embeddable content.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleAntiquités en France - Le guide des antiquairesThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
Layout viewport1350 × 4643 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements866Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth9How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth13The deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes1Embedded documents. Each is a separate page the browser loads and renders.
Script tags18Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Resource hints

2 hints
dns-prefetch
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/
preconnect
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

6 technologies

Third-party tools

5 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Tag-manager
  • Google Tag Manager
Survelliance
  • Google Tag Manager
Surveillance
  • Google Tag Manager
  • Google Analytics
Analytics
  • Google Analytics

Data from run 2

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index0.55 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change0.37 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change1.57 sscreen stops changing · 1.20 s after first
nothing painted yet
≥85%
≥95% rendered
0.37 sFirst Visual Change
Visual Complete 85%1.10 s
Visual Complete 95%1.40 s
Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change1.57 s
Visual Readiness1.20 s· first to last change
00.5 s1.0 s1.5 s
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 0.3 s0.3s
Visual progress at 0.5 s0.5s
Visual progress at 0.7 s0.7s
Visual progress at 1 s1.0s
Visual progress at 1.2 s1.2s
Visual progress at 1.4 s1.4s
Visual progress at 1.6 s1.6s
FCP0.34s
LCP0.34s
VC851.10s
Long tasks
0.0s0.3s0.6s1.0s1.3s1.6s

Google Web Vitals

from run 2
57 msTTFB
Good
212 msTBT
Needs improvement

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

344 msLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB57 ms
  • Resource load delay43 ms
  • Resource load duration16 ms
  • Element render delay228 ms

Element

Element type
<img>
Size (w × h)
12880
URL
https://www.antiquit...ages/logo-aef.png
Load time
173 ms
Style recalculation before LCP
5 recalculations touching 601 elements (62.858 ms) — the largest touched 369 elements (35.163 ms)

DOM path

body > header > div:eq(0) > div > a > img
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

The Largest Contentful Paint API matched this image:

LCP element

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.034cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 89% of your 0.034 CLS. div:eq(1) moved at 499 ms. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

  • 0.030
    89% of CLSshifted at 499 ms
    <div class="container-marketplace">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1)
    <nav class="hidden md:flex items-center gap-1">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > nav
    <div class="flex items-center gap-2">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > div
    <div class="aef-search-wrap">
    body > header > div:eq(1) > div > div > form > div
    <div class="aef-megamenu-nav">
    body > header > div:eq(1) > div > div > div
Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Server timings

Timing data the server chose to expose through Server-Timing response headers on the main document — typically backend time, cache status or experiment flags.

Server timings

1 entry
NameDurationDescription
cfExtPri0 ms–

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Visual Elements3
LargestImagelogo-aef.png
Display time366 ms
Position (x, y)67, 7
Size (w × h)172 × 58
HTML snippet
<img src="/images/logo-aef.png" alt="Antiquités en France" width="205" height="69" class="aef-brand-logo-img" fetchpriority="high">
LargestImage preview
Heading
Display time1.533 s
Position (x, y)97, 252
Size (w × h)1155 × 79
HTML snippet
<h1 class="aef-hero-title"></h1>
LargestContentfulPaintlogo-aef.png
Display time366 ms
Position (x, y)67, 7
Size (w × h)172 × 58
HTML snippet
<img src="/images/logo-aef.png" alt="Antiquités en France" width="205" height="69" class="aef-brand-logo-img" fetchpriority="high">
LargestContentfulPaint preview

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionH3
Total requests42
Total domains4
Transfer size758.6 KB
Content size1.7 MB
Missing compression1
Cookies10 third-party

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

HeaderValue
age0
alt-svch3=":443"; ma=86400
cache-controlmax-age=180, public, s-maxage=180
cf-cache-statusDYNAMIC
cf-raya49266245d21d808-CDG
content-encodingzstd
content-security-policyframe-ancestors 'self'
content-security-policy-report-onlydefault-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://js.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://connect.facebook.net https://*.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://www.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://api.stripe.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://*.posthog.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.s3.amazonaws.com https://*.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com https://*.io.cloud.ovh.net; frame-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://checkout.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://recaptcha.google.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateMon, 12 Oct 2026 01:40:52 GMT
nel{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
priorityu=0,i
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
report-to{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=XRbSsIzz%2FSiWj%2BiBLyUHsCObsx5JnQwXo2YHJGhrAFXQr04zE2wSCCBsmks4oms7llVAaeN3Aa2%2FsGULwtX0GGSrRmfzPM7GcdkDf8YKly8uw70nUatb2ICmR0pbs5h0VLjwvT0eimfCAyVvNVga"}]}
servercloudflare
server-timingcfExtPri
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
varyAccept-Encoding
x-aef-cacheHIT
x-content-digesten08186393247118af0555f6e7535de317
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-powered-byPHP/8.5.11
x-symfony-cachestale/invalid/store

Response codes

200
3992.9%
204
24.8%
302
12.4%

Requests and sizes per content type

6 types

Transfer size758.6 KB

  • javascript54.4%
  • font26.5%
  • image13.0%
  • css3.3%
  • html2.5%
  • plain0.32%

Content size1.7 MB

  • javascript70.1%
  • font10.9%
  • css7.3%
  • html6.2%
  • image5.5%

Requests41

  • image34.1%
  • font29.3%
  • javascript22.0%
  • plain7.3%
  • css4.9%
  • html2.4%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB111.1 KB1
css0 b24.9 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b412.5 KB1.2 MB9
image5.5 KB98.3 KB97.5 KB14
font0 b201.4 KB194.7 KB12
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b3
Total5.5 KB758.6 KB1.7 MB41

Data per domain

4 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
www.antiquites-en-france.com793 ms360.7 KB788.2 KB26
www.googletagmanager.com430 ms304.1 KB906.1 KB2
aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net2.210 s93.7 KB93.7 KB12
region1.google-analytics.com39 msN/A0 b2

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds1 year1 year
Last modified2 hours4 weeks9 weeks

Requests loaded after onLoad event

2 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image1.5 KB1
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain0 b1
Total1.5 KB2

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

6 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript191.1 KB2
image1.5 KB1
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain2.4 KB3
Total195.0 KB6

CPU

120 ms of 323 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT212 ms
Max potential input delay170 ms
Total long tasks7
Total time653 ms
Last task at846 ms
Before first paint241 ms3 tasks
Before FCP241 ms3 tasks
Before LCP241 ms3 tasks
After load170 ms1 task

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames6every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time344.3 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout70.1 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP94.9 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Blocking after load120.5 msafter the load event — didn't delay page load

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
js3rd party1170.4 ms120.4 ms–script tag
app.183e975c.js1125.1 ms77.3 ms44.8 msscript tag
main.js1111.3 ms61.4 ms0.7 msscript tag
686.1d5dc2ba.js186.2 ms56.2 ms24.6 mstimer or animation callback
gtm.js3rd party156.7 ms6.8 ms–script tag

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 170.5 msat 846 ms · after load
blocking 120.5 ms
  • Scripts & other work170.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
js3rd party
Ran for
170.4 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #2 · 146.6 msat 238.8 ms · before LCP
blocking 84.7 ms
  • Scripts & other work137.1 ms
  • Animation callbacks9.4 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 44.8 ms
Ran for
125.1 ms
Forced style and layout
44.8 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #3 · 113.5 msat 542.3 ms · before load
blocking 62.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work112.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.8 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 0.7 ms
Ran for
111.3 ms
Forced style and layout
0.7 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran in
an iframe inside this page
Long animation frame #4 · 126.6 msat 389.6 ms · before load
blocking 59.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work91.8 ms
  • Animation callbacks29.4 ms
  • Style & layout5.4 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 24.6 ms
Ran for
75.1 ms
Forced style and layout
24.6 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
e
Position in source
character 200333 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
11.1 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 207073 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #5 · 157.9 msat 71.7 ms · before LCP
blocking 10.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work157.6 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.2 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
5.2 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #6 · 56.8 msat 659.4 ms · before load
blocking 6.8 ms
  • Scripts & other work56.8 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
gtm.js3rd party
Ran for
56.7 ms
How it started
script tag

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Blocking time per script (trace)

Total Blocking Time attributed per script from the Chrome trace: every main-thread task longer than 50 ms blocks input for the remainder, and each blocking task is credited to the script whose own code ran the longest during that task.

TBT309 ms
Blocking tasks7
TBT before LCP93.3 ms3 tasks

What kind of work blocked

mostly running javascript · 309 ms total
Running JavaScript238.5 ms77.2%
Style & layout52.0 ms16.8%
Garbage collection8.0 ms2.6%
Parsing HTML & CSS7.2 ms2.3%
Other browser work1.7 ms0.6%
Paint & composite1.0 ms0.3%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript0.6 ms0.2%
Running JavaScript (77%): the scripts responsible are listed right below. See Timers
Style & layout (17%): usually a large DOM, expensive CSS selectors or JavaScript forcing synchronous layout. See Forced reflows · Forced layout per script · Style invalidations (Rendering tab)

Where the time went

All main-thread work during the full page load, not just the share that blocked input. Calculated from the Chrome trace.

Categories

928 ms total
Running JavaScript526 ms56.7%
Style & layout215 ms23.2%
Other browser work (scheduling)98 ms10.6%
Parsing HTML & CSS44 ms4.7%
Paint & composite26 ms2.8%
Garbage collection15 ms1.6%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript4 ms0.4%
What do these categories mean?
Parsing HTML & CSSparseHTML
Reading the HTML and CSS and building the page structure. Grows with document size — a big server-rendered page costs more here.
Style & layoutstyleLayout
Working out which CSS rules apply and where every element goes on the page. Grows with DOM size and selector complexity.
Parsing & compiling JavaScriptscriptParseCompile
Parsing and compiling JavaScript before it can run — the cost of shipping bytes of JS, even unused ones.
Running JavaScriptscriptEvaluation
Running JavaScript: event handlers, timers, promise callbacks and script execution.
Paint & compositepaintCompositeRender
Painting pixels and assembling layers into the frames you see on screen.
Garbage collectiongarbageCollection
Reclaiming memory JavaScript no longer uses. A lot of it means allocation-heavy code.
Other browser work (scheduling)other
Chrome’s own task management: per-task overhead and thousands of sub-millisecond scheduler ticks — not page work you can attribute or optimize away. On this page 97 ms of it is this per-task bookkeeping (RunTask self time in the trace).

CPU time per script

Timers

How much setTimeout/setInterval work the page runs, credited to the script that scheduled each timer. Many zero-delay timers mean work sliced into a machine-gun of tiny tasks; repeating timers are polling.

Timers set61
Times fired57
Fire time126.1 ms
Zero-delay timers41
Repeating timers2
Zero-delay slicing: nd in https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K split work into 12 back-to-back tasks costing 41 ms. Consider batching the work or moving it to requestIdleCallback or a worker.

Timer cost by script

7 scripts

Forced reflows

A forced reflow happens when JavaScript reads a layout-triggering property (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) inside a handler, forcing the browser to synchronously recompute layout. The scripts below caused most of the page's reflows. Fix them in priority order.

Scripts causing reflows

6 reflows ≥ 2 ms across 4 scripts

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Scripts forcing layout

2 of 3 scripts

First vs third party CPU time

Main-thread CPU time from the Chrome trace split by domain. First party is antiquites-en-france.com.

First party366 ms
Third party271 ms
Domains2

CPU time per domain/tool

Domain / tool breakdown

2 entities
www.antiquites-en-france.com
429.5 ms
Google Tag Manager
272.5 ms

Non-composited animations

Animations that fell back from the compositor to the main thread, blocking each frame instead of running on the GPU.

Why they could not be composited

1 animation
  • animation has no visible change1×

The reason decides the action: “animation has no visible change” means Chrome skipped compositing because nothing visible moves — harmless. Property-related reasons mean the keyframes animate something other than transform or opacity.

Want to dig deeper? Download the Chrome trace and drag-and-drop it into Performance in DevTools.

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests8
Tools2
Categories3

Categories

3 categories

Requests by category8

  • survelliance4 req · 2 tools50.0%
  • tag-manager2 req · 1 tool25.0%
  • analytics2 req · 1 tool25.0%

Unmatched third party domains

1 domain

Domains that didn't match any tool in Third party web. If you are sure they are third party domains, please do a PR to that project. You can also fine tune the list using --firstParty.

  • aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net

First party vs third party

26 first · 16 third party

Transfer size758.6 KB

  • First party360.7 KB47.6%
  • Third party397.9 KB52.4%

Content size1.7 MB

  • First party788.2 KB44.1%
  • Third party999.8 KB55.9%

Requests42

  • First party2661.9%
  • Third party1638.1%

First party requests and sizes per content type

26 requests

Calculated using .*antiquites-en-france.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB111.1 KB1
css0 b24.9 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b108.3 KB347.3 KB7
image0 b4.6 KB3.8 KB2
font0 b201.4 KB194.7 KB12
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b1
TotalN/A360.7 KB788.2 KB26

Third party requests and sizes per content type

16 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b0 b0 b0
javascript0 b304.1 KB906.1 KB2
image5.5 KB93.7 KB93.7 KB12
font0 b0 b0 b0
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b0 b0 b2
Total5.5 KB397.9 KB999.8 KB16

Axe

Axe is an accessibility testing engine for websites and other HTML-based user interfaces. Tested using axe-core version 4.11.4. Read more about axe-core.

✓ No accessibility violations across the runs.