Run 2 summary

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

Tested 2026-10-06 01:41:07 using Chrome 152.0.7977.64 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPUThird partyaxe

Summary

Google Web Vitals

32 msTTFB
624 msLargest Contentful Paint
0.035Cumulative Layout Shift
183 msTotal Blocking Time

Loading

624 msFirst Paint
7.580 sFully Loaded
154 msMax Potential FID

Page weight & requests

702.8 KBTotal transfer size
1.7 MBTotal content size
38Requests

CPU

4Long tasks
2.421 sLast long task at

Visual progress

3.500 sFirst Visual Change
3.989 sSpeed Index
4.266 sVisual Complete 85%
6.266 sVisual Complete 99%
6.300 sLast Visual Change
Screenshot
Run 2 · after page complete

Waterfall

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 2
0.000 s
0s2s4s6s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

38 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
0 %
Frame at 800 ms
800 ms
0 %
Frame at 900 ms
900 ms
0 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
0 %
Frame at 1.500 s
1.500 s
0 %
Frame at 1.600 s
1.600 s
0 %
Frame at 2.500 s
2.500 s
0 %
Frame at 2.600 s
2.600 s
0 %
Frame at 3.500 s
3.500 s
56 %
Frame at 3.600 s
3.600 s
56 %
Frame at 3.700 s
3.700 s
56 %
Frame at 3.800 s
3.800 s
56 %
Frame at 3.900 s
3.900 s
56 %
Frame at 4.000 s
4.000 s
56 %
Frame at 4.100 s
4.100 s
56 %
Frame at 4.200 s
4.200 s
67 %
Frame at 4.300 s
4.300 s
86 %
Frame at 4.400 s
4.400 s
86 %
Frame at 4.500 s
4.500 s
88 %
Frame at 4.600 s
4.600 s
90 %
Frame at 4.700 s
4.700 s
90 %
Frame at 4.800 s
4.800 s
91 %
Frame at 4.900 s
4.900 s
91 %
Frame at 5.000 s
5.000 s
92 %
Frame at 5.100 s
5.100 s
92 %
Frame at 5.200 s
5.200 s
93 %
Frame at 5.300 s
5.300 s
93 %
Frame at 5.400 s
5.400 s
93 %
Frame at 5.500 s
5.500 s
93 %
Frame at 5.600 s
5.600 s
93 %
Frame at 5.700 s
5.700 s
93 %
Frame at 5.800 s
5.800 s
94 %
Frame at 5.900 s
5.900 s
94 %
Frame at 6.000 s
6.000 s
94 %
Frame at 6.100 s
6.100 s
94 %
Frame at 6.200 s
6.200 s
94 %
Frame at 6.300 s
6.300 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Frames

How smoothly Chrome delivered frames to the screen during the test. Dropped counts only frames Chrome flags as affecting smoothness. On mostly-static pages the longest gap includes idle time where there was simply nothing to draw.

Frames shown590
Partial14
Dropped39
Effective FPS56
Longest gap127 msat 617 ms

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 624 ms on a 32 ms first byte; the 1 render-blocking request was done by 551 ms.

Style recalculation

measured by Chrome during this run

Style the browser had to recalculate before it could paint: many elements or a lot of time spent here points at expensive CSS on the critical rendering path. The recalculation count and the largest single one tell the two problems apart: one massive style change touching most of the page (few recalculations, the largest close to the total) needs different medicine than thousands of tiny ones (many recalculations, each tiny).

Style recalculation is not holding up your paint. 17 ms of restyling before the page painted, 2.7 % of the time to First Contentful Paint. Nothing here needs attention.

Before first & largest contentful paint (same paint, 624 ms)

Recalculations3
Elements374
Total time16.68 ms
Largest recalculation310 elements · 10.557 ms

The recalculation work before first paint is 2.7 % of the time to First Contentful Paint.

Render blocking requests

1 request · 18.9 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint; the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
www.antiquites-en-france.com · TTFB 32 ms
267 ms
19.2 KB265 ms
css · www.antiquites-en-france.com
506 ms
18.9 KB506 ms
LCP resource
logo-aef.png — downloaded by 294 ms, rendered at 624 ms
19 ms
3.1 KB19 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after FCP, at 775 ms
22.4 KB158 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after FCP, at 776 ms
23.3 KB159 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after FCP, at 777 ms
23.2 KB160 ms
0156 ms312 msFCP · LCP 624 ms

Style invalidations

Why the browser had to recalculate style and layout: every DOM/style change invalidates some set of nodes, and the same class or attribute churning over and over is the pattern to hunt. Counts, not milliseconds: the time is in the style recalculation numbers above.

Chase what keeps changing after the page is up. 166 style recalculations and 1 020 layout invalidations fired after first paint, on a page the user was already looking at. The biggest driver is attribute class (25×). Start with the script under "Scripts causing invalidations" that keeps triggering it.

Style recalculations191166 after first paint
Layout invalidations1 5651 020 after first paint

Changes that keep invalidating

top 4
  • attribute: class25×
  • attribute: data-aos-easing1×
  • attribute: data-aos-duration1×
  • attribute: data-aos-delay1×

Invalidation reasons

split at first paint

After first paint

Invalidations on a page the user was already looking at, the actionable half.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A node was inserted into the page47–
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.54–
Related style rule48–
A stylesheet rule changed12–
Frame1–
An @keyframes rule changed2–
Control1–
JavaScript changed an inline styleSet a class instead of writing element.style, so the browser can batch the work.1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–823
An element entered layout–129
An element left layout–43
A style change forced layout–11
An element's size changed–8
Scrollbar changed–5
An SVG element changed–1

Before first paint: building the page

The page being constructed and styled for the first render. Expected work, shown for scale.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A node was inserted into the page22–
A stylesheet rule changed1–
Frame2–
An element entered layout–541
An element left layout–3
Scrollbar changed–1

Scripts causing invalidations

top 5

1 animation runs on the main thread instead of on the browser's fast path that animates without blocking other page work (the compositor); they can make the rendering you see above janky. See them on the CPU tab.

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

Performance advice

87
8 warnings3 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Tag Manager.googleTagManager

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Google Tag Manager makes it possible for non tech users to add scripts to your page that will downgrade performance.

infoAvoid too many fontsfewFonts

The page has 12 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

How many fonts do you need on a page for the user to get the message? Fonts can slow down the rendering of content, try to avoid loading too many of them because worst case it can make the text invisible until they are loaded (FOIT—flash of invisible text), best case they will flicker the text content when they arrive.

Offenders
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 417.9 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.3 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/runtime.882d785a.js2.0 KB2.9 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/686.1d5dc2ba.js71.8 KB254.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/971.c0d484bd.js13.4 KB45.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/app.183e975c.js648 B111 B
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K125.4 KB367.5 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/home.885e1790.js5.3 KB14.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/89.a3b9b01d.js2.9 KB6.6 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/b/scripts/jsd/...008a69eab/main.js9.8 KB20.8 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-58XGFJWZ1E&cx=c&gtm=4e6a21176.9 KB532.4 KB
warn(20)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 4 CPU long tasks with the total of 383 ms. The total blocking time is 183 ms . However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • self
  • same-origin-descendant
  • self
  • self
warn(80)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 2 requests with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 2 images (out of 14) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(86)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 2 images (out of 14) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(90)Avoid doing redirectsassetsRedirects

The page has 1 redirect. 1 of the redirects are from the base domain, please fix them!

A redirect is one extra step for the user to download the asset. Avoid that if you want to be fast. Redirects are even more of a showstopper on mobile.

Offenders
warn(90)Always compress text contentcompressAssets

The page has 1 request that are served uncompressed. You could save a lot of bytes by sending them compressed instead.

In the early days of the Internet there were browsers that didn't support compressing (gzipping) text content. They do now. Make sure you compress HTML, JSON, JavaScript, CSS and SVG. It will save bytes for the user; making the page load faster and use less bandwith.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/b/scripts/jsd/...008a69eab/main.js9.8 KB20.8 KB
warn(92)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 1 below-the-fold image without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 4 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders

Best practice advice

92
1 warning2 info
infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 24 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 2 responses that sets a pragma no-cache header (that is a request header). There are 30 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
warn(50)Avoid too many third party requeststhirdParty

The page do 32% requests to third party domains (12 requests and 352.9 kB). First party is 26 requests and 366.8 kB. The regex .*antiquites-en-france.* was used to calculate first/third party requests.

Do not load most of your content from third party URLs.

infoDo not send too long headerslongHeaders

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/ has a header content-security-policy-report-only that is 1031 characters long. https://www.antiquit.../a460f658ca91b868 has a header cf-chl-out-s that is 2265 characters long.

Do not send response headers that are too long.

Offenders

Privacy advice

72
6 warnings2 info
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Avoid embedding services from surveillance capitalist companiessurveillance

The page embeds 2 resources from companies that profit from user surveillance. Consider privacy-respecting alternatives.

Embedding scripts or iframes from companies whose business model is surveillance capitalism (Google, Facebook, etc.) leaks detailed user data on every page view, often before the user has had a chance to consent. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism for background. Prefer privacy-respecting alternatives where possible.

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 11% requests that are 3rd party (4 requests with a size of 309.6 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 2 tag-manager requests and uses 1 tag-manager tool. The page do 2 survelliance requests and uses 1 survelliance tool. The page do 4 surveillance requests and uses 2 surveillance tools. The page do 2 analytics requests and uses 1 analytics tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(70)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

The policy declares no default-src or script-src directive, which means scripts can be loaded from anywhere. Add at least default-src so unknown directive types fall back to a safe value. Set object-src 'none' (or a default-src 'none' fallback) so the page cannot load Flash, plugins or other legacy embeddable content.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleAntiquités en France - Le guide des antiquairesThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
Layout viewport1350 × 4643 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements869Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth9How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth13The deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes1Embedded documents. Each is a separate page the browser loads and renders.
Script tags18Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Resource hints

2 hints
dns-prefetch
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/
preconnect
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

6 technologies

Third-party tools

5 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Tag-manager
  • Google Tag Manager
Survelliance
  • Google Tag Manager
Surveillance
  • Google Tag Manager
  • Google Analytics
Analytics
  • Google Analytics

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index3.99 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change3.50 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change6.30 sscreen stops changing · 2.80 s after first
nothing painted yet
≥85%
First Visual Change3.50 s
Visual Complete 85%4.27 s
Visual Complete 95% · Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change6.27 s
Visual Readiness2.80 s· first to last change
02.0 s4.0 s6.0 s
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 1.5 s1.5s
Visual progress at 3.7 s3.7s
Visual progress at 4.2 s4.2s
Visual progress at 4.7 s4.7s
Visual progress at 5.2 s5.2s
Visual progress at 5.8 s5.8s
Visual progress at 6.3 s6.3s
FCP0.62s
LCP0.62s
VC854.27s
Long tasks
0.0s1.3s2.5s3.8s5.0s6.3s

Google Web Vitals

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

624 msLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB32 ms
  • Resource load delay249 ms
  • Resource load duration19 ms
  • Element render delay324 ms

Element

Element type
<img>
Size (w × h)
12880
URL
https://www.antiquit...ages/logo-aef.png
Load time
566 ms
Style recalculation before LCP
3 recalculations touching 374 elements (16.68 ms) — the largest touched 310 elements (10.557 ms)

DOM path

body > header > div:eq(0) > div > a > img
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

The Largest Contentful Paint API matched this image:

LCP element

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.035cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 87% of your 0.035 CLS. div:eq(1) moved at 969 ms. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

  • 0.031
    87% of CLSshifted at 969 ms
    <div class="container-marketplace">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1)
    <nav class="hidden md:flex items-center gap-1">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > nav
    <div class="flex items-center gap-2">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > div
    <div class="aef-search-wrap">
    body > header > div:eq(1) > div > div > form > div
    <div class="aef-megamenu-nav">
    body > header > div:eq(1) > div > div > div
Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Server timings

Timing data the server chose to expose through Server-Timing response headers on the main document — typically backend time, cache status or experiment flags.

Server timings

1 entry
NameDurationDescription
cfExtPri0 ms–

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Chrome internal metrics (CDP)33
Audio handlers0
Audio worklet processors0
Documents10
Frames9
JS event listeners100
Layout objects681
Media key sessions0
Media keys0
Nodes2648
Resources56
Context lifecycle state observers52
V8 per context datas5
Worker global scopes0
Uacss resources0
Rtc peer connections0
Resource fetchers10
Ad subframes0
Detached script states3
Array buffer contents2
Layout count12
Recalc style count51
Layout duration99
Recalc style duration52
Dev tools command duration26
Script duration461
V8 compile duration2
Task duration863
Task other duration224
Thread time1
Process time2
JS heap used size12509936
JS heap total size16130048
First meaningful paint749
Visual Elements3
LargestImagelogo-aef.png
Display time3.633 s
Position (x, y)67, 7
Size (w × h)172 × 58
HTML snippet
<img src="/images/logo-aef.png" alt="Antiquités en France" width="205" height="69" class="aef-brand-logo-img" fetchpriority="high">
Heading
Display time5.333 s
Position (x, y)97, 252
Size (w × h)1155 × 79
HTML snippet
<h1 class="aef-hero-title"></h1>
LargestContentfulPaintlogo-aef.png
Display time3.633 s
Position (x, y)67, 7
Size (w × h)172 × 58
HTML snippet
<img src="/images/logo-aef.png" alt="Antiquités en France" width="205" height="69" class="aef-brand-logo-img" fetchpriority="high">

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionH3
Total requests38
Total domains4
Transfer size702.8 KB
Content size1.7 MB
Missing compression1
Cookies10 third-party

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

HeaderValue
age0
alt-svch3=":443"; ma=86400
cache-controlmax-age=180, public, s-maxage=180
cf-cache-statusDYNAMIC
cf-raya460f658ca91b868-CDG
content-encodingzstd
content-security-policyframe-ancestors 'self'
content-security-policy-report-onlydefault-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://js.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://connect.facebook.net https://*.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://www.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://api.stripe.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://*.posthog.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.s3.amazonaws.com https://*.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com https://*.io.cloud.ovh.net; frame-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://checkout.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://recaptcha.google.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateTue, 06 Oct 2026 01:41:11 GMT
nel{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
priorityu=0,i
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
report-to{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=UU3d5roa34kfSIHkOaQ4MQUoKgKi1sAs6Bghj92tLEJK9jsHot1RlX6Ki58r3Iej8yUJ9thzYzgulKkjhIlMIRMsXR%2BgO12AJQNKZQiCecYN4UKAbPj5fiSr3%2FFLO1X7PztJzwWRgZckGS61QitE"}]}
servercloudflare
server-timingcfExtPri
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
varyAccept-Encoding
x-aef-cacheHIT
x-content-digesten3d552a455241ab514dd976ae3314f979
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-powered-byPHP/8.5.10
x-symfony-cachestale/invalid/store

Response codes

200
3592.1%
204
25.3%
302
12.6%

Requests and sizes per content type

6 types

Transfer size702.8 KB

  • javascript58.1%
  • font28.7%
  • image6.7%
  • css3.5%
  • html2.7%
  • plain0.34%

Content size1.7 MB

  • javascript72.0%
  • font11.3%
  • css7.6%
  • html6.5%
  • image2.7%

Requests37

  • font32.4%
  • image27.0%
  • javascript24.3%
  • plain8.1%
  • css5.4%
  • html2.7%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB111.7 KB1
css0 b24.9 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b408.1 KB1.2 MB9
image3.6 KB46.9 KB46.1 KB10
font0 b201.4 KB194.7 KB12
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b3
Total3.6 KB702.8 KB1.7 MB37

Data per domain

4 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
www.antiquites-en-france.com3.402 s358.2 KB785.8 KB26
www.googletagmanager.com1.932 s302.3 KB899.9 KB2
aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net5.382 s42.3 KB42.3 KB8
region1.google-analytics.com50 msN/A0 b2

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds1 year1 year
Last modified2 hours4 weeks9 weeks

Requests loaded after onLoad event

2 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image1.5 KB1
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain0 b1
Total1.5 KB2

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

9 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript186.8 KB2
image11.8 KB3
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain2.4 KB3
Total200.9 KB9

CPU

104 ms of 199 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT183 ms
Max potential input delay154 ms
Total long tasks4
Total time383 ms
Last task at2.421 s
Before first paint0 ms0 tasks
Before FCP0 ms0 tasks
Before LCP0 ms0 tasks
After load0 ms0 tasks

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames9every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time238.4 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout20.6 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP12.6 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Input waiting2 framesa real interaction was delayed (INP)

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
js1154.4 ms104.3 ms–script tag
main.js196.9 ms45.3 ms1 msscript tag
gtm.js167.7 ms18.1 ms–script tag
app.183e975c.js166.2 ms15.6 ms1 msscript tag
686.1d5dc2ba.js140.7 ms8.6 ms15.1 mstimer or animation callback
www.antiquites-en-france.com16.4 ms5.3 ms–script tag
home.885e1790.js19.1 ms1.9 ms3.5 mstimer or animation callback

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 154.5 msat 2.421 s · before load
blocking 104.4 ms
  • Scripts & other work154.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
154.4 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #2 · 106.4 msat 1.428 s · before load
input was waitingblocking 48.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work104.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks1.8 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 1 ms
Ran for
96.9 ms
Forced style and layout
1 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran in
an iframe inside this page
Long animation frame #3 · 85.1 msat 667.7 ms · before load
blocking 26.3 ms
  • Scripts & other work9.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks60.7 ms
  • Style & layout14.9 ms
  • Render0 ms

The browser did not report which script was responsible for this frame — typically its own style/layout work, or a cross-origin script it will not name.

Long animation frame #4 · 71.5 msat 1.537 s · before load
blocking 18.8 ms
  • Scripts & other work70.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.1 ms
  • Style & layout0.9 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
67.7 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #5 · 72.5 msat 812.2 ms · before load
blocking 16.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work71.9 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.5 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 1 ms
Ran for
66.2 ms
Forced style and layout
1 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #6 · 63 msat 595 ms · before LCP
blocking 12.6 ms
  • Scripts & other work15.3 ms
  • Animation callbacks47.7 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
6.4 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #7 · 60.9 msat 885.6 ms · before load
blocking 10.5 ms
  • Scripts & other work31.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks19 ms
  • Style & layout10.2 ms
  • Render0 ms
3 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 18.6 ms
Ran for
31.3 ms
Forced style and layout
15.1 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
e
Position in source
character 200333 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
9.1 ms
Forced style and layout
3.5 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
a
Position in source
character 14498 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
9.4 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 207073 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)

2 more long frames carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Blocking time per script (trace)

Total Blocking Time attributed per script from the Chrome trace: every main-thread task longer than 50 ms blocks input for the remainder, and each blocking task is credited to the script whose own code ran the longest during that task.

TBT221.5 ms
Blocking tasks6
TBT before LCP5.1 ms1 task

What kind of work blocked

mostly running javascript · 222 ms total
Running JavaScript178.3 ms80.5%
Other browser work23.7 ms10.7%
Style & layout10.1 ms4.6%
Garbage collection3.8 ms1.7%
Parsing HTML & CSS2.8 ms1.3%
Paint & composite2.1 ms0.9%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript0.7 ms0.3%
Running JavaScript (80%): the scripts responsible are listed right below. See Timers

Where the time went

All main-thread work during the full page load, not just the share that blocked input. Calculated from the Chrome trace.

Categories

882 ms total
Running JavaScript471 ms53.4%
Other browser work (scheduling)174 ms19.7%
Style & layout153 ms17.3%
Parsing HTML & CSS35 ms4.0%
Paint & composite33 ms3.7%
Garbage collection10 ms1.1%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript6 ms0.7%
What do these categories mean?
Parsing HTML & CSSparseHTML
Reading the HTML and CSS and building the page structure. Grows with document size — a big server-rendered page costs more here.
Style & layoutstyleLayout
Working out which CSS rules apply and where every element goes on the page. Grows with DOM size and selector complexity.
Parsing & compiling JavaScriptscriptParseCompile
Parsing and compiling JavaScript before it can run — the cost of shipping bytes of JS, even unused ones.
Running JavaScriptscriptEvaluation
Running JavaScript: event handlers, timers, promise callbacks and script execution.
Paint & compositepaintCompositeRender
Painting pixels and assembling layers into the frames you see on screen.
Garbage collectiongarbageCollection
Reclaiming memory JavaScript no longer uses. A lot of it means allocation-heavy code.
Other browser work (scheduling)other
Chrome’s own task management: per-task overhead and thousands of sub-millisecond scheduler ticks — not page work you can attribute or optimize away. On this page 173 ms of it is this per-task bookkeeping (RunTask self time in the trace).

CPU time per script

Timers

How much setTimeout/setInterval work the page runs, credited to the script that scheduled each timer. Many zero-delay timers mean work sliced into a machine-gun of tiny tasks; repeating timers are polling.

Timers set58
Times fired54
Fire time76.5 ms
Zero-delay timers38
Repeating timers2
Zero-delay slicing: od in https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K split work into 11 back-to-back tasks costing 34 ms. Consider batching the work or moving it to requestIdleCallback or a worker.

Timer cost by script

7 scripts

Forced reflows

A forced reflow happens when JavaScript reads a layout-triggering property (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) inside a handler, forcing the browser to synchronously recompute layout. The scripts below caused most of the page's reflows. Fix them in priority order.

Scripts causing reflows

3 reflows ≥ 2 ms across 3 scripts

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

First vs third party CPU time

Main-thread CPU time from the Chrome trace split by domain. First party is antiquites-en-france.com.

First party250 ms
Third party261 ms
Domains2

CPU time per domain/tool

Domain / tool breakdown

2 entities
www.antiquites-en-france.com
272.4 ms
Google Tag Manager
261.7 ms

Non-composited animations

Animations that fell back from the compositor to the main thread, blocking each frame instead of running on the GPU.

Why they could not be composited

1 animation
  • animation has no visible change1×

The reason decides the action: “animation has no visible change” means Chrome skipped compositing because nothing visible moves — harmless. Property-related reasons mean the keyframes animate something other than transform or opacity.

Want to dig deeper? Download the Chrome trace and drag-and-drop it into Performance in DevTools.

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests8
Tools2
Categories3

Categories

3 categories

Requests by category8

  • survelliance4 req · 2 tools50.0%
  • tag-manager2 req · 1 tool25.0%
  • analytics2 req · 1 tool25.0%

Unmatched third party domains

1 domain

Domains that didn't match any tool in Third party web. If you are sure they are third party domains, please do a PR to that project. You can also fine tune the list using --firstParty.

  • aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net

First party vs third party

26 first · 12 third party

Transfer size702.8 KB

  • First party358.2 KB51.0%
  • Third party344.6 KB49.0%

Content size1.7 MB

  • First party785.8 KB45.5%
  • Third party942.2 KB54.5%

Requests38

  • First party2668.4%
  • Third party1231.6%

First party requests and sizes per content type

26 requests

Calculated using .*antiquites-en-france.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB111.7 KB1
css0 b24.9 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b105.8 KB344.4 KB7
image0 b4.5 KB3.8 KB2
font0 b201.4 KB194.7 KB12
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b1
TotalN/A358.2 KB785.8 KB26

Third party requests and sizes per content type

12 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b0 b0 b0
javascript0 b302.3 KB899.9 KB2
image3.6 KB42.3 KB42.3 KB8
font0 b0 b0 b0
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b0 b0 b2
Total3.6 KB344.6 KB942.2 KB12

Axe

Axe is an accessibility testing engine for websites and other HTML-based user interfaces. Tested using axe-core version 4.11.4. Read more about axe-core.

✓ No accessibility violations detected on this page.