Run 2 summary

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

Tested 2026-10-05 01:40:49 using Chrome 152.0.7977.64 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPUThird partyaxe

Summary

Google Web Vitals

62 msTTFB
548 msLargest Contentful Paint
0.281Cumulative Layout Shift
184 msTotal Blocking Time

Loading

256 msFirst Paint
6.119 sFully Loaded
134 msMax Potential FID

Page weight & requests

744.6 KBTotal transfer size
1.7 MBTotal content size
42Requests

CPU

6Long tasks
979 msLast long task at

Visual progress

267 msFirst Visual Change
580 msSpeed Index
801 msVisual Complete 85%
1.302 sVisual Complete 99%
1.302 sLast Visual Change
Screenshot
Run 2 · after page complete

Waterfall

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 2
0.000 s
0s0.5s1s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

14 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 200 ms
200 ms
0 %
Frame at 300 ms
300 ms
30 %
Frame at 400 ms
400 ms
30 %
Frame at 500 ms
500 ms
30 %
Frame at 600 ms
600 ms
83 %
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
83 %
Frame at 800 ms
800 ms
84 %
Frame at 900 ms
900 ms
86 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
87 %
Frame at 1.100 s
1.100 s
87 %
Frame at 1.200 s
1.200 s
88 %
Frame at 1.300 s
1.300 s
88 %
Frame at 1.400 s
1.400 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Frames

How smoothly Chrome delivered frames to the screen during the test. Dropped counts only frames Chrome flags as affecting smoothness. On mostly-static pages the longest gap includes idle time where there was simply nothing to draw.

Frames shown528
Partial22
Dropped24
Effective FPS56.9
Longest gap105 msat 272 ms

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 256 ms on a 62 ms first byte; the 1 render-blocking request was done by 90 ms and the remaining ~166 ms is style and layout work (30 ms of it measured style recalculation). The largest paint followed at 548 ms.

Style recalculation

measured by Chrome during this run

Style the browser had to recalculate before it could paint: many elements or a lot of time spent here points at expensive CSS on the critical rendering path. The recalculation count and the largest single one tell the two problems apart: one massive style change touching most of the page (few recalculations, the largest close to the total) needs different medicine than thousands of tiny ones (many recalculations, each tiny).

One large recalculation dominates. Restyling 376 elements cost 30 ms before the page painted (11.8 % of the time to First Contentful Paint), and a single recalculation of 371 elements accounts for 26 ms of it. Look for one class or inline-style change on a large container near the top of the DOM that restyles the whole subtree at once. The changes driving it are listed under Style invalidations below.

Before first contentful paint

Recalculations5
Elements376
Total time30.335 ms
Largest recalculation371 elements · 26.266 ms

Before largest contentful paint

Recalculations33
Elements1114
Total time92.364 ms
Largest recalculation371 elements · 27.591 ms

The recalculation work before first paint is 11.8 % of the time to First Contentful Paint.

Forced reflows before the page painted

measured by Chrome during this run

JavaScript read a layout value (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) while the page was mid-change, so the browser had to re-layout synchronously, work that blocks rendering. Reflows before First Contentful Paint delayed the first pixels; reflows before Largest Contentful Paint delayed the main content.

Forced reflows before FCP0
Time spent in forced reflows before FCP0 ms
Forced reflows before LCP26
Time spent in forced reflows before LCP47 ms

That is 8.6 % of the time to Largest Contentful Paint. The number of reflows matters more than the milliseconds: layout thrashing multiplies on slower devices.

See every forced reflow for the whole page load on the CPU tab

Render blocking requests

1 request · 18.9 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint (the dashed line is FCP, the clock ends at LCP); the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
www.antiquites-en-france.com · TTFB 62 ms
66 ms
19.2 KB65 ms
css · www.antiquites-en-france.com
17 ms
18.9 KB17 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
20 ms
12.9 KB20 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after LCP, at 607 ms
23.3 KB38 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after LCP, at 607 ms
22.4 KB11 ms
0137 ms411 msFCP 256 msLCP 548 ms

Style invalidations

Why the browser had to recalculate style and layout: every DOM/style change invalidates some set of nodes, and the same class or attribute churning over and over is the pattern to hunt. Counts, not milliseconds: the time is in the style recalculation numbers above.

Chase what keeps changing after the page is up. 797 style recalculations and 2 032 layout invalidations fired after first paint, on a page the user was already looking at. The biggest driver is attribute class (28×). Start with the script under "Scripts causing invalidations" that keeps triggering it.

Style recalculations804797 after first paint
Layout invalidations3 1912 032 after first paint

Changes that keep invalidating

top 1
  • attribute: class28×

Invalidation reasons

split at first paint

Between first and largest paint

Invalidations while the largest paint was still pending, so these delayed it.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A stylesheet rule changed224–
A node was inserted into the page46–
Related style rule26–
Frame1–
Control1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–1 233
An element entered layout–398
A style change forced layout–11
An element left layout–43
An element's size changed–11
Scrollbar changed–1

After the largest paint

Churn on the fully rendered page: wasted work and possible jank, but no paint delay.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.495–
Related style rule3–
JavaScript changed an inline styleSet a class instead of writing element.style, so the browser can batch the work.1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–104
An element entered layout–39
A style change forced layout–192

Before first paint: building the page

The page being constructed and styled for the first render. Expected work, shown for scale.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A stylesheet rule changed1–
A node was inserted into the page5–
Frame1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–562
An element entered layout–590
An element left layout–3
An element's size changed–1
Scrollbar changed–3

Scripts causing invalidations

top 5

171 animations run on the main thread instead of on the browser's fast path that animates without blocking other page work (the compositor); they can make the rendering you see above janky. See them on the CPU tab.

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

What to fix first

Performance advice

86
8 warnings3 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Tag Manager.googleTagManager

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Google Tag Manager makes it possible for non tech users to add scripts to your page that will downgrade performance.

warn(0)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 529 ms. The total blocking time is 184 ms and 1 long task before first contentful paint with total time of 95 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • same-origin-descendant
  • self
  • self
  • same-origin-descendant
  • self
  • self
infoAvoid too many fontsfewFonts

The page has 12 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

How many fonts do you need on a page for the user to get the message? Fonts can slow down the rendering of content, try to avoid loading too many of them because worst case it can make the text invisible until they are loaded (FOIT—flash of invisible text), best case they will flicker the text content when they arrive.

Offenders
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 417.7 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.3 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/runtime.882d785a.js2.0 KB2.9 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/686.1d5dc2ba.js71.8 KB254.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/971.c0d484bd.js13.4 KB45.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/app.183e975c.js648 B111 B
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K125.4 KB366.9 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/home.885e1790.js5.3 KB14.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/89.a3b9b01d.js2.9 KB6.6 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/b/scripts/jsd/...008a69eab/main.js9.7 KB20.6 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-58XGFJWZ1E&cx=c&gtm=4e69u2176.9 KB531.2 KB
warn(80)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 2 requests with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 2 images (out of 14) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(86)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 2 images (out of 14) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(90)Avoid doing redirectsassetsRedirects

The page has 1 redirect. 1 of the redirects are from the base domain, please fix them!

A redirect is one extra step for the user to download the asset. Avoid that if you want to be fast. Redirects are even more of a showstopper on mobile.

Offenders
warn(90)Always compress text contentcompressAssets

The page has 1 request that are served uncompressed. You could save a lot of bytes by sending them compressed instead.

In the early days of the Internet there were browsers that didn't support compressing (gzipping) text content. They do now. Make sure you compress HTML, JSON, JavaScript, CSS and SVG. It will save bytes for the user; making the page load faster and use less bandwith.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/b/scripts/jsd/...008a69eab/main.js9.7 KB20.6 KB
warn(92)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 1 below-the-fold image without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 4 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders

Best practice advice

68
1 error1 warning2 info
error(0)Cumulative Layout ShiftcumulativeLayoutShift

You have a poor cumulative layout shift score (0.2806). It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, with a shift higher than 0.25. You should manually check the filmstrip or video and check if it will affect the user.

Cumulative Layout Shift measures the sum total of all individual layout shift scores for unexpected layout shift that occur. The metric is measuring visual stability by quantify how often users experience unexpected layout shifts. It is one of Google Web Vitals.

warn(0)Avoid too many third party requeststhirdParty

The page do 38% requests to third party domains (16 requests and 395.8 kB). First party is 26 requests and 366.7 kB. The page transfer more bytes from third party domains (395.8 kB) then first party (366.7 kB). The regex .*antiquites-en-france.* was used to calculate first/third party requests.

Do not load most of your content from third party URLs.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 24 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 2 responses that sets a pragma no-cache header (that is a request header). There are 30 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
infoDo not send too long headerslongHeaders

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/ has a header content-security-policy-report-only that is 1031 characters long. https://www.antiquit.../a458b877dce93c74 has a header cf-chl-out-s that is 2265 characters long.

Do not send response headers that are too long.

Offenders

Privacy advice

72
6 warnings2 info
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Avoid embedding services from surveillance capitalist companiessurveillance

The page embeds 2 resources from companies that profit from user surveillance. Consider privacy-respecting alternatives.

Embedding scripts or iframes from companies whose business model is surveillance capitalism (Google, Facebook, etc.) leaks detailed user data on every page view, often before the user has had a chance to consent. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism for background. Prefer privacy-respecting alternatives where possible.

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 10% requests that are 3rd party (4 requests with a size of 309.5 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 2 tag-manager requests and uses 1 tag-manager tool. The page do 2 survelliance requests and uses 1 survelliance tool. The page do 4 surveillance requests and uses 2 surveillance tools. The page do 2 analytics requests and uses 1 analytics tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(70)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

The policy declares no default-src or script-src directive, which means scripts can be loaded from anywhere. Add at least default-src so unknown directive types fall back to a safe value. Set object-src 'none' (or a default-src 'none' fallback) so the page cannot load Flash, plugins or other legacy embeddable content.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleAntiquités en France - Le guide des antiquairesThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
Layout viewport1350 × 4643 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements868Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth9How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth13The deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes1Embedded documents. Each is a separate page the browser loads and renders.
Script tags18Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Resource hints

2 hints
dns-prefetch
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/
preconnect
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

6 technologies

Third-party tools

5 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Tag-manager
  • Google Tag Manager
Survelliance
  • Google Tag Manager
Surveillance
  • Google Tag Manager
  • Google Analytics
Analytics
  • Google Analytics

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index0.58 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change0.27 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change1.30 sscreen stops changing · 1.03 s after first
nothing painted yet
≥85%
0.27 sFirst Visual Change
0.80 sVisual Complete 85%
Visual Complete 95% · Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change1.30 s
Visual Readiness1.03 s· first to last change
00.3 s0.5 s0.8 s1.0 s
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 0.3 s0.3s
Visual progress at 0.5 s0.5s
Visual progress at 0.7 s0.7s
Visual progress at 0.8 s0.8s
Visual progress at 1 s1.0s
Visual progress at 1.2 s1.2s
Visual progress at 1.4 s1.4s
FCP0.26s
LCP0.55s
VC850.80s
Long tasks
0.0s0.3s0.6s0.8s1.1s1.4s

Google Web Vitals

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

548 msLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB62 ms
  • Resource load delay0 ms
  • Resource load duration0 ms
  • Element render delay486 ms

Element

Element type
<h1>
Size (w × h)
176280
Load time
0 ms
Style recalculation before LCP
33 recalculations touching 1114 elements (92.364 ms) — the largest touched 371 elements (27.591 ms)

DOM path

body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > h1
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.281cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 69% of your 0.281 CLS. section:eq(1) moved at 480 ms. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

  • 0.193
    69% of CLSshifted at 480 ms
    <section class="aef-section" style="padding-top: 2.5rem; padding-bottom: 2.5rem;">
    body > main > section:eq(1)
    <section class="aef-section">
    body > main > section:eq(2)
  • 0.041
    15% of CLSshifted at 696 ms
    <div class="aef-hero-content aos-init aos-animate" data-aos="fade-up" data-aos-duration="1000">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div
    <div class="aef-hero-deco">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(0)
    <div class="aef-hero-stats aos-init aos-animate" data-aos="fade-up" data-aos-delay="300" data-aos-duration="800">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > div:eq(1)
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > p:eq(0) > #text
    <div class="aef-stat-item" style="border-left:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.2); padding-left:3.5rem;">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > div:eq(1) > div:eq(2)
  • 0.027
    10% of CLSshifted at 421 ms
    <section class="aef-section" style="padding-top: 2.5rem; padding-bottom: 2.5rem;">
    body > main > section:eq(1)
    <div class="container-marketplace">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1)
    <section class="aef-section">
    body > main > section:eq(2)
    <nav class="hidden md:flex items-center gap-1">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > nav
    <div class="flex items-center gap-2">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > div
  • 0.013
    4% of CLSshifted at 251 ms
    <section class="aef-section" style="padding-top: 2.5rem; padding-bottom: 2.5rem;">
    body > main > section:eq(1)
    <section class="aef-section">
    body > main > section:eq(2)
    <div class="aef-hero-stats aos-init aos-animate" data-aos="fade-up" data-aos-delay="300" data-aos-duration="800">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > div:eq(1)
    <div class="aef-hero-buttons">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > div:eq(0)
    <div class="aef-search-wrap">
    body > header > div:eq(1) > div > div > form > div
Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Server timings

Timing data the server chose to expose through Server-Timing response headers on the main document — typically backend time, cache status or experiment flags.

Server timings

1 entry
NameDurationDescription
cfExtPri0 ms–

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Chrome internal metrics (CDP)33
Audio handlers0
Audio worklet processors0
Documents10
Frames9
JS event listeners99
Layout objects1039
Media key sessions0
Media keys0
Nodes2645
Resources56
Context lifecycle state observers52
V8 per context datas5
Worker global scopes0
Uacss resources0
Rtc peer connections0
Resource fetchers10
Ad subframes0
Detached script states3
Array buffer contents2
Layout count24
Recalc style count64
Layout duration143
Recalc style duration133
Dev tools command duration22
Script duration426
V8 compile duration2
Task duration1051
Task other duration324
Thread time1
Process time3
JS heap used size12431256
JS heap total size16130048
First meaningful paint256
Visual Elements3
LargestImagelogo-aef.png
Display time267 ms
Position (x, y)67, 7
Size (w × h)172 × 58
HTML snippet
<img src="/images/logo-aef.png" alt="Antiquités en France" width="205" height="69" class="aef-brand-logo-img" fetchpriority="high">
Heading
Display time1.302 s
Position (x, y)97, 252
Size (w × h)1155 × 79
HTML snippet
<h1 class="aef-hero-title"></h1>
LargestContentfulPaint
Display time1.302 s
Position (x, y)97, 252
Size (w × h)1155 × 79
HTML snippet
<h1 class="aef-hero-title"></h1>

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionH3
Total requests42
Total domains4
Transfer size744.6 KB
Content size1.7 MB
Missing compression1
Cookies10 third-party

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

HeaderValue
age0
alt-svch3=":443"; ma=86400
cache-controlmax-age=180, public, s-maxage=180
cf-cache-statusDYNAMIC
cf-raya458b877dce93c74-CDG
content-encodingzstd
content-security-policyframe-ancestors 'self'
content-security-policy-report-onlydefault-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://js.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://connect.facebook.net https://*.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://www.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://api.stripe.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://*.posthog.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.s3.amazonaws.com https://*.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com https://*.io.cloud.ovh.net; frame-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://checkout.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://recaptcha.google.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateMon, 05 Oct 2026 01:40:50 GMT
nel{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
priorityu=0,i
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
report-to{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=Urf8BI7XBtn%2Fz5wPKz%2FLPjRh4dN%2B%2FuXwImSuuiS5dNtu5QeUXmOWQFPg%2FIuEN%2FTFZ7kltEgTh8K1N1b4%2FOldzxavg5bzt%2BZvdc53viTxod%2BiV3%2Fsc7Hhtu3Pz8fSY4lcvNn0tnvKlG62sF9U4Nbe"}]}
servercloudflare
server-timingcfExtPri
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
varyAccept-Encoding
x-aef-cacheHIT
x-content-digesten5188c5f22e45ce0ed55d52d23774cd5d
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-powered-byPHP/8.5.10
x-symfony-cachestale/invalid/store

Response codes

200
3992.9%
204
24.8%
302
12.4%

Requests and sizes per content type

6 types

Transfer size744.6 KB

  • javascript54.8%
  • font27.1%
  • image11.9%
  • css3.3%
  • html2.6%
  • plain0.32%

Content size1.7 MB

  • javascript70.3%
  • font11.0%
  • css7.4%
  • html6.3%
  • image5.0%

Requests41

  • image34.1%
  • font29.3%
  • javascript22.0%
  • plain7.3%
  • css4.9%
  • html2.4%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB111.6 KB1
css0 b24.9 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b407.9 KB1.2 MB9
image5.5 KB88.9 KB88.1 KB14
font0 b201.4 KB194.7 KB12
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b3
Total5.5 KB744.6 KB1.7 MB41

Data per domain

4 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
www.antiquites-en-france.com1.433 s358.1 KB785.5 KB26
www.googletagmanager.com598 ms302.3 KB898.1 KB2
aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net2.060 s84.3 KB84.3 KB12
region1.google-analytics.com41 msN/A0 b2

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds1 year1 year
Last modified2 hours3 weeks8 weeks

Requests loaded after onLoad event

4 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript176.9 KB1
image1.5 KB1
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain0 b2
Total178.4 KB4

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

14 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript186.6 KB2
image32.1 KB5
font71.8 KB4
favicon0 b0
plain2.4 KB3
Total292.9 KB14

CPU

85 ms of 194 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT184 ms
Max potential input delay134 ms
Total long tasks6
Total time529 ms
Last task at979 ms
Before first paint95 ms1 task
Before FCP95 ms1 task
Before LCP335 ms4 tasks
After load134 ms1 task

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames10every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time263.8 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout46 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP147.2 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Blocking after load96.5 msafter the load event — didn't delay page load
Input waiting3 framesa real interaction was delayed (INP)

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
js1134.1 ms85 ms–script tag
main.js199 ms50.3 ms0.9 msscript tag
app.183e975c.js185.7 ms32.6 ms34 msscript tag
gtm.js160.4 ms15.8 ms–script tag
686.1d5dc2ba.js136.1 ms4.5 ms10.4 mstimer or animation callback
89.a3b9b01d.js16.3 ms3 ms–script tag
www.antiquites-en-france.com16.7 ms2.2 ms–script tag

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 136.5 msat 978 ms · after load
blocking 85.6 ms
  • Scripts & other work135 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.5 ms
  • Style & layout1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
134.1 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #2 · 109.5 msat 499.3 ms · before LCP
blocking 53.4 ms
  • Scripts & other work105.1 ms
  • Animation callbacks4.4 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 0.9 ms
Ran for
99 ms
Forced style and layout
0.9 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran in
an iframe inside this page
Long animation frame #3 · 137.4 msat 77.9 ms · before LCP
blocking 45.7 ms
  • Scripts & other work137.2 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.1 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
6.7 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #4 · 103.4 msat 253 ms · before LCP
input was waitingblocking 38.3 ms
  • Scripts & other work100.8 ms
  • Animation callbacks2.5 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 34 ms
Ran for
85.7 ms
Forced style and layout
34 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #5 · 86.1 msat 611.3 ms · before load
blocking 20.1 ms
  • Scripts & other work76.6 ms
  • Animation callbacks9.4 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
60.4 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #6 · 63.6 msat 846.2 ms · after load
blocking 7 ms
  • Scripts & other work6.6 ms
  • Animation callbacks57 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms

The browser did not report which script was responsible for this frame — typically its own style/layout work, or a cross-origin script it will not name.

Long animation frame #7 · 60.5 msat 360.4 ms · before LCP
blocking 5.4 ms
  • Scripts & other work33.1 ms
  • Animation callbacks21.6 ms
  • Style & layout5.8 ms
  • Render0 ms
3 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 11.1 ms
Ran for
27.9 ms
Forced style and layout
10.4 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
e
Position in source
character 200333 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
7.2 ms
Forced style and layout
0.7 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
a
Position in source
character 14498 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
8.2 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 207073 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #8 · 56.5 msat 423.9 ms · before LCP
input was waitingblocking 4.4 ms
  • Scripts & other work9.1 ms
  • Animation callbacks47.4 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
6.3 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #9 · 63.9 msat 912.7 ms · after load
blocking 3.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work62 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.7 ms
  • Style & layout1.2 ms
  • Render0 ms

The browser did not report which script was responsible for this frame — typically its own style/layout work, or a cross-origin script it will not name.

1 more long frame carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Blocking time per script (trace)

Total Blocking Time attributed per script from the Chrome trace: every main-thread task longer than 50 ms blocks input for the remainder, and each blocking task is credited to the script whose own code ran the longest during that task.

TBT248.9 ms
Blocking tasks8
TBT before LCP138.7 ms4 tasks

What kind of work blocked

mostly running javascript · 249 ms total
Running JavaScript160.0 ms64.3%
Style & layout65.8 ms26.4%
Paint & composite10.3 ms4.1%
Other browser work7.4 ms3.0%
Garbage collection3.3 ms1.3%
Parsing HTML & CSS1.6 ms0.6%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript0.5 ms0.2%
Running JavaScript (64%): the scripts responsible are listed right below. See Timers
Style & layout (26%): usually a large DOM, expensive CSS selectors or JavaScript forcing synchronous layout. See Forced reflows · Forced layout per script · Style invalidations (Rendering tab)

Where the time went

All main-thread work during the full page load, not just the share that blocked input. Calculated from the Chrome trace.

Categories

1.067 s total
Running JavaScript436 ms40.9%
Style & layout278 ms26.1%
Other browser work (scheduling)180 ms16.9%
Paint & composite128 ms12.0%
Parsing HTML & CSS32 ms3.0%
Garbage collection8 ms0.7%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript5 ms0.5%
What do these categories mean?
Parsing HTML & CSSparseHTML
Reading the HTML and CSS and building the page structure. Grows with document size — a big server-rendered page costs more here.
Style & layoutstyleLayout
Working out which CSS rules apply and where every element goes on the page. Grows with DOM size and selector complexity.
Parsing & compiling JavaScriptscriptParseCompile
Parsing and compiling JavaScript before it can run — the cost of shipping bytes of JS, even unused ones.
Running JavaScriptscriptEvaluation
Running JavaScript: event handlers, timers, promise callbacks and script execution.
Paint & compositepaintCompositeRender
Painting pixels and assembling layers into the frames you see on screen.
Garbage collectiongarbageCollection
Reclaiming memory JavaScript no longer uses. A lot of it means allocation-heavy code.
Other browser work (scheduling)other
Chrome’s own task management: per-task overhead and thousands of sub-millisecond scheduler ticks — not page work you can attribute or optimize away. On this page 179 ms of it is this per-task bookkeeping (RunTask self time in the trace).

CPU time per script

Timers

How much setTimeout/setInterval work the page runs, credited to the script that scheduled each timer. Many zero-delay timers mean work sliced into a machine-gun of tiny tasks; repeating timers are polling.

Timers set58
Times fired54
Fire time74.4 ms
Zero-delay timers38
Repeating timers2
Zero-delay slicing: od in https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K split work into 11 back-to-back tasks costing 37 ms. Consider batching the work or moving it to requestIdleCallback or a worker.

Timer cost by script

7 scripts

Forced reflows

A forced reflow happens when JavaScript reads a layout-triggering property (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) inside a handler, forcing the browser to synchronously recompute layout. The scripts below caused most of the page's reflows. Fix them in priority order.

Scripts causing reflows

5 reflows ≥ 2 ms across 4 scripts

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Scripts forcing layout

2 of 4 scripts

First vs third party CPU time

Main-thread CPU time from the Chrome trace split by domain. First party is antiquites-en-france.com.

First party267 ms
Third party235 ms
Domains2

CPU time per domain/tool

Domain / tool breakdown

2 entities
www.antiquites-en-france.com
285.9 ms
Google Tag Manager
235.2 ms

Non-composited animations

Animations that fell back from the compositor to the main thread, blocking each frame instead of running on the GPU.

Each chip below is a CSS property the page tried to animate that Chrome couldn't hand to the compositor. Swap it for a transform or opacity equivalent where you can.

Properties to fix

20 properties · 171 animations
  • border-top-right-radius18×
  • border-bottom-left-radius18×
  • border-bottom-right-radius18×
  • border-top-left-radius18×
  • box-shadow12×
  • border-left-color6×
  • border-left-width6×
  • border-right-color6×
  • border-right-width6×
  • color6×
  • border-top-color6×
  • border-top-width6×
  • padding-bottom6×
  • font-weight6×
  • padding-left6×
  • padding-right6×
  • padding-top6×
  • border-bottom-color6×
  • border-bottom-width6×
  • font-size3×

Want to dig deeper? Download the Chrome trace and drag-and-drop it into Performance in DevTools.

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests8
Tools2
Categories3

Categories

3 categories

Requests by category8

  • survelliance4 req · 2 tools50.0%
  • tag-manager2 req · 1 tool25.0%
  • analytics2 req · 1 tool25.0%

Unmatched third party domains

1 domain

Domains that didn't match any tool in Third party web. If you are sure they are third party domains, please do a PR to that project. You can also fine tune the list using --firstParty.

  • aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net

First party vs third party

26 first · 16 third party

Transfer size744.6 KB

  • First party358.1 KB48.1%
  • Third party386.6 KB51.9%

Content size1.7 MB

  • First party785.5 KB44.4%
  • Third party982.4 KB55.6%

Requests42

  • First party2661.9%
  • Third party1638.1%

First party requests and sizes per content type

26 requests

Calculated using .*antiquites-en-france.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB111.6 KB1
css0 b24.9 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b105.6 KB344.2 KB7
image0 b4.6 KB3.8 KB2
font0 b201.4 KB194.7 KB12
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b1
TotalN/A358.1 KB785.5 KB26

Third party requests and sizes per content type

16 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b0 b0 b0
javascript0 b302.3 KB898.1 KB2
image5.5 KB84.3 KB84.3 KB12
font0 b0 b0 b0
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b0 b0 b2
Total5.5 KB386.6 KB982.4 KB16

Axe

Axe is an accessibility testing engine for websites and other HTML-based user interfaces. Tested using axe-core version 4.11.4. Read more about axe-core.

1 accessibility rule failed, affecting 1 element.

Start with the 1 serious issue.

critical00 elements
serious11 element
moderate00 elements
minor00 elements

Violations

1 finding

serious · 1 rule

seriousElements must meet minimum color contrast ratio thresholds1 elementcolor-contrast

Ensure the contrast between foreground and background colors meets WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds

cat.colorwcag2aawcag143TTv5TT13.cEN-301-549EN-9.1.4.3ACTRGAAv4RGAA-3.2.1

Read the axe-core docs for this rule →

Failure summary

Fix any of the following: Element has insufficient color contrast of 3.89 (foreground color: #0088cc, background color: #ffffff, font size: 10.6pt (14.08px), font weight: bold). Expected contrast ratio of 4.5:1

Offending nodes (1)
  • <a href="/catalogue" class="aef-section-link hidden sm:inline-flex flex-shrink-0 ml-6">