Page summary

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

Tested 2026-09-25 01:40:48 using Chrome 151.0.7922.75 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPUThird partyaxe

This page is fast to paint, snappy to interact with and accessible, but prone to layout shifts, loose on best practices and weak on user privacy.

79 / 100
Coach overall
86 / 100
Performance
68 / 100
Best practice
72 / 100
Privacy

How it loaded →

0 → 2.733 s · median run
Frame at 0 ms
start
Frame at 600 ms
600 ms
Frame at 1100 ms
Largest paint1.100 s
Frame at 1700 ms
1.700 s
Frame at 2200 ms
2.200 s
Frame at 2800 ms
Complete2.800 s
266 ms
First Visual Change
865 ms
Speed Index
1.800 s
Visual Complete 85%
2.733 s
Last Visual Change
TTFB67 msLCP652 msTBT195 msCLS0.28
0
Critical violations
0
Serious violations
0
Moderate violations
0
Minor violations

What to act on · top recommendations

Avoid using Google Tag Manager.

0 / 100

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Avoid CPU Long Tasks

0 / 100

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 507 ms. The total blocking time is 195 ms and 1 long task before first contentful paint with total time of 62 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Avoid too many fonts

0 / 100

The page has 12 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

Google Web Vitals

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Time To First Byte (TTFB)62 ms67 ms69 ms78 msruns disagree ±12%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)560 ms652 ms799 ms1.184 sruns disagree ±48%
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0.03410.27730.19720.2803runs disagree ±44%

Visual Metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First visual change33 ms266 ms500 ms1.202 sruns disagree ±220%
Last visual change1.466 s2.733 s2.657 s3.771 sruns disagree ±42%
Speed index661 ms865 ms1.121 s1.836 sruns disagree ±68%
Largest image166 ms266 ms545 ms1.202 sruns disagree ±195%
Heading1.233 s1.466 s2.157 s3.771 sruns disagree ±87%
Largest contentful paint1.202 s1.233 s1.300 s1.466 sruns disagree ±11%
Last meaningful paint1.233 s1.466 s2.157 s3.771 sruns disagree ±87%
Visual readiness1.200 s2.569 s2.156 s2.700 sruns disagree ±29%
Visual complete 85900 ms1.800 s1.979 s3.237 sruns disagree ±65%
Visual complete 951.466 s2.666 s2.634 s3.771 sruns disagree ±43%
Visual complete 991.466 s2.733 s2.657 s3.771 sruns disagree ±42%

CPU

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
Total Blocking Time143 ms195 ms181 ms205 msruns disagree ±16%
Max Potential FID133 ms145 ms144 ms153 msvaries ±7%
CPU long tasks 5666varies ±8%
CPU last long task happens at1.116 s2.332 s2.295 s3.437 sruns disagree ±50%

More metrics

min · median · mean · max of 3 runs
MetricMinMedianMeanMaxRuns agree?
First paint240 ms424 ms616 ms1.184 sruns disagree ±111%
Load event end1.263 s2.483 s2.440 s3.575 sruns disagree ±47%

Waterfall

Run 1 SpeedIndex median

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 1 · median
0.000 s
0s1s2s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

29 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 100 ms
100 ms
0 %
Frame at 200 ms
200 ms
1 %
Frame at 300 ms
300 ms
2 %
Frame at 400 ms
400 ms
3 %
Frame at 500 ms
500 ms
31 %
Frame at 600 ms
600 ms
77 %
Frame at 700 ms
700 ms
77 %
Frame at 800 ms
800 ms
81 %
Frame at 900 ms
900 ms
82 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
82 %
Frame at 1.100 s
1.100 s
82 %
Frame at 1.200 s
1.200 s
82 %
Frame at 1.300 s
1.300 s
82 %
Frame at 1.400 s
1.400 s
83 %
Frame at 1.500 s
1.500 s
83 %
Frame at 1.600 s
1.600 s
84 %
Frame at 1.700 s
1.700 s
84 %
Frame at 1.800 s
1.800 s
85 %
Frame at 1.900 s
1.900 s
85 %
Frame at 2.000 s
2.000 s
85 %
Frame at 2.100 s
2.100 s
86 %
Frame at 2.200 s
2.200 s
87 %
Frame at 2.300 s
2.300 s
87 %
Frame at 2.400 s
2.400 s
87 %
Frame at 2.500 s
2.500 s
88 %
Frame at 2.600 s
2.600 s
88 %
Frame at 2.700 s
2.700 s
98 %
Frame at 2.800 s
2.800 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Frames

How smoothly Chrome delivered frames to the screen during the test. Dropped counts only frames Chrome flags as affecting smoothness. On mostly-static pages the longest gap includes idle time where there was simply nothing to draw.

Frames shown607
Partial17
Dropped40
Effective FPS56.3
Longest gap133 msat 420 ms

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 424 ms on a 78 ms first byte; the 1 render-blocking request was done by 103 ms and the remaining ~321 ms is style and layout work (35 ms of it measured style recalculation). The largest paint followed at 560 ms.

Style recalculation

measured by Chrome during this run

Style the browser had to recalculate before it could paint: many elements or a lot of time spent here points at expensive CSS on the critical rendering path. The recalculation count and the largest single one tell the two problems apart: one massive style change touching most of the page (few recalculations, the largest close to the total) needs different medicine than thousands of tiny ones (many recalculations, each tiny).

One large recalculation dominates. Restyling 599 elements cost 35 ms before the page painted (8.3 % of the time to First Contentful Paint), and a single recalculation of 368 elements accounts for 20 ms of it. Look for one class or inline-style change on a large container near the top of the DOM that restyles the whole subtree at once. The changes driving it are listed under Style invalidations below.

Before first contentful paint

Recalculations4
Elements599
Total time35.154 ms
Largest recalculation368 elements · 20.448 ms

Before largest contentful paint

Recalculations5
Elements599
Total time68.959 ms
Largest recalculation368 elements · 33.805 ms

The recalculation work before first paint is 8.3 % of the time to First Contentful Paint.

Forced reflows before the page painted

measured by Chrome during this run

JavaScript read a layout value (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) while the page was mid-change, so the browser had to re-layout synchronously, work that blocks rendering. Reflows before First Contentful Paint delayed the first pixels; reflows before Largest Contentful Paint delayed the main content.

Forced reflows before FCP0
Time spent in forced reflows before FCP0 ms
Forced reflows before LCP1
Time spent in forced reflows before LCP33.8 ms

That is 6 % of the time to Largest Contentful Paint. The number of reflows matters more than the milliseconds: layout thrashing multiplies on slower devices.

See every forced reflow for the whole page load on the CPU tab

Render blocking requests

1 request · 18.8 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint (the dashed line is FCP, the clock ends at LCP); the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
www.antiquites-en-france.com · TTFB 78 ms
301 ms
19.2 KB300 ms
css · www.antiquites-en-france.com
13 ms
18.8 KB13 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after LCP, at 576 ms
23.2 KB149 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after LCP, at 591 ms
22.4 KB135 ms
web font · www.antiquites-en-france.com · finished after first paint
loaded after LCP, at 592 ms
23.3 KB136 ms
0140 ms280 msFCP 424 msLCP 560 ms

Style invalidations

Why the browser had to recalculate style and layout: every DOM/style change invalidates some set of nodes, and the same class or attribute churning over and over is the pattern to hunt. Counts, not milliseconds: the time is in the style recalculation numbers above.

Chase what keeps changing after the page is up. 962 style recalculations and 1 221 layout invalidations fired after first paint, on a page the user was already looking at. The biggest driver is attribute class (25×). Start with the script under "Scripts causing invalidations" that keeps triggering it.

Style recalculations1 178962 after first paint
Layout invalidations2 6731 221 after first paint

Changes that keep invalidating

top 4
  • attribute: class25×
  • attribute: data-aos-easing1×
  • attribute: data-aos-duration1×
  • attribute: data-aos-delay1×

Invalidation reasons

split at first paint

Between first and largest paint

Invalidations while the largest paint was still pending, so these delayed it.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–504
An element's size changed–4

After the largest paint

Churn on the fully rendered page: wasted work and possible jank, but no paint delay.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.633–
A stylesheet rule changed12–
An @keyframes rule changed220–
A node was inserted into the page46–
Related style rule48–
Frame1–
Control1–
JavaScript changed an inline styleSet a class instead of writing element.style, so the browser can batch the work.1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–322
An element entered layout–127
A style change forced layout–212
An element left layout–43
An element's size changed–8
Scrollbar changed–1

Before first paint: building the page

The page being constructed and styled for the first render. Expected work, shown for scale.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A stylesheet rule changed210–
A node was inserted into the page5–
Frame1–
A web font finished loadingPreload the font or use font-display so a late swap does not re-style the page.–578
An element entered layout–868
An element left layout–3
Scrollbar changed–3

Scripts causing invalidations

top 5

172 animations run on the main thread instead of on the browser's fast path that animates without blocking other page work (the compositor); they can make the rendering you see above janky. See them on the CPU tab.

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

What to fix first

Performance advice

86
9 warnings3 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Tag Manager.googleTagManager

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Google Tag Manager makes it possible for non tech users to add scripts to your page that will downgrade performance.

warn(0)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 6 CPU long tasks with the total of 507 ms. The total blocking time is 195 ms and 1 long task before first contentful paint with total time of 62 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • same-origin-descendant
  • self
infoAvoid too many fontsfewFonts

The page has 12 font requests. Do you really need them? What value does the fonts give the user?

How many fonts do you need on a page for the user to get the message? Fonts can slow down the rendering of content, try to avoid loading too many of them because worst case it can make the text invisible until they are loaded (FOIT—flash of invisible text), best case they will flicker the text content when they arrive.

Offenders
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 415 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.3 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/runtime.882d785a.js2.0 KB2.9 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/686.1d5dc2ba.js71.8 KB254.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/971.c0d484bd.js13.4 KB45.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/app.183e975c.js650 B111 B
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K124.2 KB361.9 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/home.885e1790.js5.3 KB14.3 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/build/89.a3b9b01d.js2.9 KB6.6 KB
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/b/scripts/jsd/...008a69eab/main.js9.7 KB20.4 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-58XGFJWZ1E&cx=c&gtm=4e69n1175.4 KB526.3 KB
warn(80)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 2 requests with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 2 images (out of 14) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(86)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 2 images (out of 14) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(90)Avoid doing redirectsassetsRedirects

The page has 1 redirect. 1 of the redirects are from the base domain, please fix them!

A redirect is one extra step for the user to download the asset. Avoid that if you want to be fast. Redirects are even more of a showstopper on mobile.

Offenders
warn(90)Always compress text contentcompressAssets

The page has 1 request that are served uncompressed. You could save a lot of bytes by sending them compressed instead.

In the early days of the Internet there were browsers that didn't support compressing (gzipping) text content. They do now. Make sure you compress HTML, JSON, JavaScript, CSS and SVG. It will save bytes for the user; making the page load faster and use less bandwith.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/h/b/scripts/jsd/...008a69eab/main.js9.7 KB20.4 KB
warn(92)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 1 below-the-fold image without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
warn(95)Inline CSS for faster first renderinlineCss

The page has both inline CSS and CSS requests even though it uses a HTTP/2-ish connection. If you have many users on slow connections, it can be better to only inline the CSS. Run your own tests and check the waterfall graph to see what happens.

In the early days of the Internet, inlining CSS was one of the ugliest things you can do. That has changed if you want your page to start rendering fast for your user. Always inline the critical CSS when you use HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 (avoid doing CSS requests that block rendering) and lazy load and cache the rest of the CSS. It is a little more complicated when using HTTP/2. Does your server support HTTP push? Then maybe that can help. Do you have a lot of users on a slow connection and are serving large chunks of HTML? Then it could be better to use the inline technique, becasue some servers always prioritize HTML content over CSS so the user needs to download the HTML first, before the CSS is downloaded.

infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 4 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders

Best practice advice

68
1 error1 warning2 info
error(0)Cumulative Layout ShiftcumulativeLayoutShift

You have a poor cumulative layout shift score (0.2773). It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, with a shift higher than 0.25. You should manually check the filmstrip or video and check if it will affect the user.

Cumulative Layout Shift measures the sum total of all individual layout shift scores for unexpected layout shift that occur. The metric is measuring visual stability by quantify how often users experience unexpected layout shifts. It is one of Google Web Vitals.

warn(0)Avoid too many third party requeststhirdParty

The page do 38% requests to third party domains (16 requests and 531.7 kB). First party is 26 requests and 366 kB. The page transfer more bytes from third party domains (531.7 kB) then first party (366 kB). The regex .*antiquites-en-france.* was used to calculate first/third party requests.

Do not load most of your content from third party URLs.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 24 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 2 responses that sets a pragma no-cache header (that is a request header). There are 30 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
infoDo not send too long headerslongHeaders

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/ has a header content-security-policy-report-only that is 1031 characters long. https://www.antiquit.../a40652b29e324562 has a header cf-chl-out-s that is 2265 characters long.

Do not send response headers that are too long.

Offenders

Privacy advice

72
6 warnings2 info
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Avoid embedding services from surveillance capitalist companiessurveillance

The page embeds 2 resources from companies that profit from user surveillance. Consider privacy-respecting alternatives.

Embedding scripts or iframes from companies whose business model is surveillance capitalism (Google, Facebook, etc.) leaks detailed user data on every page view, often before the user has had a chance to consent. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism for background. Prefer privacy-respecting alternatives where possible.

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 10% requests that are 3rd party (4 requests with a size of 306.8 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 2 tag-manager requests and uses 1 tag-manager tool. The page do 2 survelliance requests and uses 1 survelliance tool. The page do 4 surveillance requests and uses 2 surveillance tools. The page do 2 analytics requests and uses 1 analytics tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(70)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

The policy declares no default-src or script-src directive, which means scripts can be loaded from anywhere. Add at least default-src so unknown directive types fall back to a safe value. Set object-src 'none' (or a default-src 'none' fallback) so the page cannot load Flash, plugins or other legacy embeddable content.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleAntiquités en France - Le guide des antiquairesThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
Layout viewport1350 × 4620 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements865Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth9How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth13The deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes1Embedded documents. Each is a separate page the browser loads and renders.
Script tags18Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Resource hints

2 hints
dns-prefetch
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/
preconnect
  • https://aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net/

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

6 technologies

Third-party tools

5 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Tag-manager
  • Google Tag Manager
Survelliance
  • Google Tag Manager
Surveillance
  • Google Tag Manager
  • Google Analytics
Analytics
  • Google Analytics

Data from run 1

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index0.86 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change0.03 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change2.73 sscreen stops changing · 2.70 s after first
≥85%
0.03 sFirst Visual Change
1.80 sVisual Complete 85%
Visual Complete 95%2.67 s
Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change2.73 s
Visual Readiness2.70 s· first to last change
00.5 s1.0 s1.5 s2.0 s2.5 s
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 0.4 s0.4s
Visual progress at 0.8 s0.8s
Visual progress at 1.2 s1.2s
Visual progress at 1.6 s1.6s
Visual progress at 2 s2.0s
Visual progress at 2.4 s2.4s
Visual progress at 2.8 s2.8s
FCP0.42s
LCP0.56s
VC851.80s
Long tasks
0.0s0.6s1.1s1.7s2.2s2.8s

Google Web Vitals

from run 1

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

560 msLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB78 ms
  • Resource load delay0 ms
  • Resource load duration0 ms
  • Element render delay482 ms

Element

Element type
<h1>
Size (w × h)
176280
Load time
0 ms
Style recalculation before LCP
5 recalculations touching 599 elements (68.959 ms) — the largest touched 368 elements (33.805 ms)

DOM path

body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > h1
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.277cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 79% of your 0.277 CLS. section:eq(1) moved at 456 ms. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

  • 0.218
    79% of CLSshifted at 456 ms
    <section class="aef-section" style="padding-top: 2.5rem; padding-bottom: 2.5rem;">
    body > main > section:eq(1)
    <section class="aef-section">
    body > main > section:eq(2)
  • 0.048
    17% of CLSshifted at 789 ms
    <div class="container-marketplace">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1)
    <div class="aef-hero-content aos-init aos-animate" data-aos="fade-up" data-aos-duration="1000">
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div
    <nav class="hidden md:flex items-center gap-1">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > nav
    body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div > p:eq(0) > #text
    <div class="flex items-center gap-2">
    body > header > div:eq(0) > div > div
Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Visual Elements3
LargestImagelogo-aef.png
Display time166 ms
Position (x, y)67, 7
Size (w × h)172 × 58
HTML snippet
<img src="/images/logo-aef.png" alt="Antiquités en France" width="205" height="69" class="aef-brand-logo-img" fetchpriority="high">
LargestImage preview
Heading
Display time1.233 s
Position (x, y)97, 252
Size (w × h)1155 × 79
HTML snippet
<h1 class="aef-hero-title"></h1>
LargestContentfulPaint
Display time1.233 s
Position (x, y)97, 252
Size (w × h)1155 × 79
HTML snippet
<h1 class="aef-hero-title"></h1>

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionHTTP/2.0
Total requests42
Total domains4
Transfer size876.6 KB
Content size1.8 MB
Missing compression1
Cookies10 third-party

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://www.antiquites-en-france.com/

HeaderValue
age0
alt-svch3=":443"; ma=86400
cache-controlmax-age=180, public, s-maxage=180
cf-cache-statusDYNAMIC
cf-raya40652b29e324562-CDG
content-encodingzstd
content-security-policyframe-ancestors 'self'
content-security-policy-report-onlydefault-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://js.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://connect.facebook.net https://*.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://www.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://api.stripe.com https://maps.googleapis.com https://*.clarity.ms https://*.posthog.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.s3.amazonaws.com https://*.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com https://*.io.cloud.ovh.net; frame-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://checkout.stripe.com https://www.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://recaptcha.google.com; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateFri, 25 Sep 2026 01:40:49 GMT
nel{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
report-to{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=g0dFM%2BPP8ypH%2BqLPsknrdCsr9%2BYXdL1EHr81kGwrCXmF4SV6ns%2BQAzBOSRmv5OgOnIjzwHP2%2FXOt%2FDKcaYRtJArq%2BmbMZ3XzpmcHmIekvutfRqRNyzHmJRXWqURPGp1ZdV4Os%2BstvIKBPu8zkbwF"}]}
servercloudflare
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
varyAccept-Encoding
x-aef-cacheHIT
x-content-digestenacfafa37b74ef49ac02e6ca92753a54b
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-powered-byPHP/8.5.10
x-symfony-cachestale/invalid/store

Response codes

200
3992.9%
204
24.8%
302
12.4%

Requests and sizes per content type

6 types

Transfer size876.6 KB

  • javascript46.2%
  • image25.6%
  • font22.9%
  • css2.8%
  • html2.2%
  • plain0.27%

Content size1.8 MB

  • javascript65.1%
  • image11.8%
  • font10.3%
  • css6.9%
  • html5.9%

Requests41

  • image34.1%
  • font29.3%
  • javascript22.0%
  • plain7.3%
  • css4.9%
  • html2.4%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB110.9 KB1
css0 b24.8 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b405.3 KB1.2 MB9
image5.5 KB224.2 KB223.4 KB14
font0 b200.8 KB194.7 KB12
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b3
Total5.5 KB876.6 KB1.8 MB41

Data per domain

4 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
www.antiquites-en-france.com3.264 s357.4 KB784.5 KB26
www.googletagmanager.com1.921 s299.6 KB888.2 KB2
aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net8.118 s219.6 KB219.6 KB12
region1.google-analytics.com37 msN/A0 b2

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds1 year1 year
Last modified1 hour2 weeks7 weeks

Requests loaded after onLoad event

2 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image1.5 KB1
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain0 b1
Total1.5 KB2

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

13 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript185.1 KB2
image141.2 KB7
font0 b0
favicon0 b0
plain2.4 KB3
Total328.7 KB13

CPU

96 ms of 232 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT195 ms
Max potential input delay145 ms
Total long tasks6
Total time507 ms
Last task at2.332 s
Before first paint62 ms1 task
Before FCP62 ms1 task
Before LCP170 ms2 tasks
After load0 ms0 tasks

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames9every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time273.6 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout74.5 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP100.9 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Input waiting1 framea real interaction was delayed (INP)

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
js3rd party1145.8 ms95.8 ms–script tag
app.183e975c.js1108.7 ms62.5 ms44.7 msscript tag
main.js188.8 ms37.6 ms0.6 msscript tag
686.1d5dc2ba.js161 ms30.7 ms29.2 mstimer or animation callback
gtm.js3rd party154.3 ms4.7 ms–script tag

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 145.8 msat 2.332 s · before load
blocking 95.8 ms
  • Scripts & other work145.8 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
js3rd party
Ran for
145.8 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #2 · 128 msat 462.3 ms · before LCP
blocking 68.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work118.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks9.2 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 44.7 ms
Ran for
108.7 ms
Forced style and layout
44.7 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #3 · 96.7 msat 1.444 s · before load
blocking 40.3 ms
  • Scripts & other work95.3 ms
  • Animation callbacks1.3 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 0.6 ms
Ran for
88.8 ms
Forced style and layout
0.6 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran in
an iframe inside this page
Long animation frame #4 · 92.2 msat 595.6 ms · before load
blocking 31.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work61.9 ms
  • Animation callbacks24.5 ms
  • Style & layout5.8 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame · forced style & layout 29.2 ms
Ran for
50.8 ms
Forced style and layout
29.2 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
e
Position in source
character 200333 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
10.2 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 207073 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #5 · 290.5 msat 92.9 ms · before LCP
blocking 21.5 ms
  • Scripts & other work236 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout54.5 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
7.2 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #6 · 65.2 msat 391 ms · before LCP
blocking 11.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work5.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks59.6 ms
  • Style & layout0.1 ms
  • Render0 ms

The browser did not report which script was responsible for this frame — typically its own style/layout work, or a cross-origin script it will not name.

Long animation frame #7 · 63.6 msat 1.353 s · before load
blocking 5.4 ms
  • Scripts & other work62.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.9 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
gtm.js3rd party
Ran for
54.3 ms
How it started
script tag

2 more long frames carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Blocking time per script (trace)

Total Blocking Time attributed per script from the Chrome trace: every main-thread task longer than 50 ms blocks input for the remainder, and each blocking task is credited to the script whose own code ran the longest during that task.

TBT229.8 ms
Blocking tasks7
TBT before LCP87.9 ms3 tasks

What kind of work blocked

mostly running javascript · 230 ms total
Running JavaScript169.0 ms73.5%
Style & layout49.4 ms21.5%
Garbage collection4.5 ms2.0%
Other browser work2.7 ms1.2%
Paint & composite2.7 ms1.2%
Parsing HTML & CSS1.1 ms0.5%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript0.5 ms0.2%
Running JavaScript (74%): the scripts responsible are listed right below. See Timers
Style & layout (21%): usually a large DOM, expensive CSS selectors or JavaScript forcing synchronous layout. See Forced reflows · Forced layout per script · Style invalidations (Rendering tab)

Top scripts blocking the main thread

4 of 4 scripts

Where the time went

All main-thread work during the full page load, not just the share that blocked input. Calculated from the Chrome trace.

Categories

1.064 s total
Running JavaScript445 ms41.8%
Style & layout306 ms28.8%
Other browser work (scheduling)182 ms17.1%
Paint & composite79 ms7.4%
Parsing HTML & CSS27 ms2.5%
Garbage collection19 ms1.8%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript6 ms0.6%
What do these categories mean?
Parsing HTML & CSSparseHTML
Reading the HTML and CSS and building the page structure. Grows with document size — a big server-rendered page costs more here.
Style & layoutstyleLayout
Working out which CSS rules apply and where every element goes on the page. Grows with DOM size and selector complexity.
Parsing & compiling JavaScriptscriptParseCompile
Parsing and compiling JavaScript before it can run — the cost of shipping bytes of JS, even unused ones.
Running JavaScriptscriptEvaluation
Running JavaScript: event handlers, timers, promise callbacks and script execution.
Paint & compositepaintCompositeRender
Painting pixels and assembling layers into the frames you see on screen.
Garbage collectiongarbageCollection
Reclaiming memory JavaScript no longer uses. A lot of it means allocation-heavy code.
Other browser work (scheduling)other
Chrome’s own task management: per-task overhead and thousands of sub-millisecond scheduler ticks — not page work you can attribute or optimize away. On this page 181 ms of it is this per-task bookkeeping (RunTask self time in the trace).

CPU time per script

Timers

How much setTimeout/setInterval work the page runs, credited to the script that scheduled each timer. Many zero-delay timers mean work sliced into a machine-gun of tiny tasks; repeating timers are polling.

Timers set58
Times fired54
Fire time91.1 ms
Zero-delay timers38
Repeating timers2
Zero-delay slicing: kd in https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PXVP329K split work into 11 back-to-back tasks costing 30 ms. Consider batching the work or moving it to requestIdleCallback or a worker.

Timer cost by script

7 scripts

Forced reflows

A forced reflow happens when JavaScript reads a layout-triggering property (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) inside a handler, forcing the browser to synchronously recompute layout. The scripts below caused most of the page's reflows. Fix them in priority order.

Scripts causing reflows

7 reflows ≥ 2 ms across 4 scripts

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Scripts forcing layout

2 of 3 scripts

First vs third party CPU time

Main-thread CPU time from the Chrome trace split by domain. First party is antiquites-en-france.com.

First party320 ms
Third party234 ms
Domains2

CPU time per domain/tool

Domain / tool breakdown

2 entities
www.antiquites-en-france.com
359.4 ms
Google Tag Manager
234.6 ms

Non-composited animations

Animations that fell back from the compositor to the main thread, blocking each frame instead of running on the GPU.

Each chip below is a CSS property the page tried to animate that Chrome couldn't hand to the compositor. Swap it for a transform or opacity equivalent where you can.

Properties to fix

20 properties · 172 animations
  • border-top-right-radius18×
  • border-bottom-left-radius18×
  • border-bottom-right-radius18×
  • border-top-left-radius18×
  • box-shadow12×
  • border-left-color6×
  • border-left-width6×
  • border-right-color6×
  • border-right-width6×
  • color6×
  • border-top-color6×
  • border-top-width6×
  • padding-bottom6×
  • font-weight6×
  • padding-left6×
  • padding-right6×
  • padding-top6×
  • border-bottom-color6×
  • border-bottom-width6×
  • font-size3×

Want to dig deeper? Download the Chrome trace and drag-and-drop it into Performance in DevTools.

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests8
Tools2
Categories3

Categories

3 categories

Requests by category8

  • survelliance4 req · 2 tools50.0%
  • tag-manager2 req · 1 tool25.0%
  • analytics2 req · 1 tool25.0%

Unmatched third party domains

1 domain

Domains that didn't match any tool in Third party web. If you are sure they are third party domains, please do a PR to that project. You can also fine tune the list using --firstParty.

  • aef-storage.s3.sbg.io.cloud.ovh.net

First party vs third party

26 first · 16 third party

Transfer size876.6 KB

  • First party357.4 KB40.8%
  • Third party519.2 KB59.2%

Content size1.8 MB

  • First party784.5 KB41.5%
  • Third party1.1 MB58.5%

Requests42

  • First party2661.9%
  • Third party1638.1%

First party requests and sizes per content type

26 requests

Calculated using .*antiquites-en-france.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b19.2 KB110.9 KB1
css0 b24.8 KB131.2 KB2
javascript0 b105.7 KB343.9 KB7
image0 b4.5 KB3.8 KB2
font0 b200.8 KB194.7 KB12
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b2.4 KB0 b1
TotalN/A357.4 KB784.5 KB26

Third party requests and sizes per content type

16 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b0 b0 b0
javascript0 b299.6 KB888.2 KB2
image5.5 KB219.6 KB219.6 KB12
font0 b0 b0 b0
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b0 b0 b2
Total5.5 KB519.2 KB1.1 MB16

Axe

Axe is an accessibility testing engine for websites and other HTML-based user interfaces. Tested using axe-core version 4.11.4. Read more about axe-core.

✓ No accessibility violations across the runs.